Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Interpreting the Early Modern WorldStitching Women’s Lives: Interpreting the Artifacts of Sewing and Needlework

Interpreting the Early Modern World: Stitching Women’s Lives: Interpreting the Artifacts of... [In our introduction to this book, James Symonds and I characterized interpretive historical archaeology as a multifaceted congeries of contextual, politically and socially engaged approaches to the study of human lives and experiences. American historical archaeologists have employed variants of interpretive archaeology in their work since, at the very least, the 1970s (see, e.g., Ascher and Fairbanks, 1971; Deetz, 1977; Leone, 1977), although, apart from the noteworthy exceptions by Ascher and Fairbanks, Deetz, and Leone cited above, interpretive historical archaeologies failed to gain prominence in the field until after postprocessual archaeology (Hodder, 1991) and postcolonial theory (Trigger, 2005:444–478; Wilkie, 2009:337) gained firm traction as alternatives to the long-entrenched canon of processualism (Beaudry, 1996, 2007).] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Interpreting the Early Modern WorldStitching Women’s Lives: Interpreting the Artifacts of Sewing and Needlework

Editors: Beaudry, Mary C.; Symonds, James

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/interpreting-the-early-modern-world-stitching-women-s-lives-1eswzxP0DJ
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
ISBN
978-0-387-70758-7
Pages
143 –158
DOI
10.1007/978-0-387-70759-4_7
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[In our introduction to this book, James Symonds and I characterized interpretive historical archaeology as a multifaceted congeries of contextual, politically and socially engaged approaches to the study of human lives and experiences. American historical archaeologists have employed variants of interpretive archaeology in their work since, at the very least, the 1970s (see, e.g., Ascher and Fairbanks, 1971; Deetz, 1977; Leone, 1977), although, apart from the noteworthy exceptions by Ascher and Fairbanks, Deetz, and Leone cited above, interpretive historical archaeologies failed to gain prominence in the field until after postprocessual archaeology (Hodder, 1991) and postcolonial theory (Trigger, 2005:444–478; Wilkie, 2009:337) gained firm traction as alternatives to the long-entrenched canon of processualism (Beaudry, 1996, 2007).]

Published: Sep 30, 2010

Keywords: Gender Identity; Material Culture; Social Rank; Historical Archaeology; Postcolonial Theory

There are no references for this article.