Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Intramural and external R&D: evidence for complementarity or substitutability

Intramural and external R&D: evidence for complementarity or substitutability Abstract The aim of this study is to ascertain the impact of two firm innovation strategies—namely, intramural R&D and external R&D, including either contracted R&D and import of technology, upon total factor productivity (TFP). In order to evaluate these effects we consider robust estimates of TFP through a GMM approach where we account for the diverse innovation strategies carried out by firms (intramural only, external only or both). Using data for Spanish manufacturing firms drawn from the Encuesta de Estrategias Empresariales (ESEE), over the period 1991–2014, our results suggest that inhouse R&D and external R&D are complementary strategies only for large firms in high tech sectors. For the rest of firms, both strategies turn out to be substitutive. Further, R&D strategies only offer a TFP premium to exporters. We find no positive synergies between in-house and external R&D for large exporters, while for small exporters both strategies are substitutes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png "Economia Politica" Springer Journals

Intramural and external R&D: evidence for complementarity or substitutability

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/intramural-and-external-r-d-evidence-for-complementarity-or-mmQk8ILfRg

References (38)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
ISSN
1120-2890
eISSN
1973-820X
DOI
10.1007/s40888-018-0100-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study is to ascertain the impact of two firm innovation strategies—namely, intramural R&D and external R&D, including either contracted R&D and import of technology, upon total factor productivity (TFP). In order to evaluate these effects we consider robust estimates of TFP through a GMM approach where we account for the diverse innovation strategies carried out by firms (intramural only, external only or both). Using data for Spanish manufacturing firms drawn from the Encuesta de Estrategias Empresariales (ESEE), over the period 1991–2014, our results suggest that inhouse R&D and external R&D are complementary strategies only for large firms in high tech sectors. For the rest of firms, both strategies turn out to be substitutive. Further, R&D strategies only offer a TFP premium to exporters. We find no positive synergies between in-house and external R&D for large exporters, while for small exporters both strategies are substitutes.

Journal

"Economia Politica"Springer Journals

Published: Aug 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.