Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The chapter analyzes the first two movies of the Godfather trilogy from an ecocritical perspective. This original vantage point allows to examine the differences between the two godfathers (Vito and Michael Corleone) not so much in terms of tradition vs. Americanization but focusing on the transition from agromafia—Mafia involvement in the food sector—to money mafia, marked by its collusion with financial capitalism. Vito’s trajectory from the fields of Sicily to the garden of his suburban mansion in Long Island involves an expansion of the Corleone family’s carbon footprint and an emphasis on conspicuous consumption, which mirrors the accelerating pace of consumer culture and resource use in the Western world after WWII. In this sense, if the death of Vito in his tomato garden symbolizes the shift from agromafia to the Nevada-based money mafia, the final sequence of The Godfather Part II, in which Michael sists alone on the shores of Lake Tahoe can be read as a comment on the anthropocentric hubris of conquering and controlling the environment.]
Published: Dec 1, 2022
Keywords: Godfather I; Godfather II; Ecocriticism; Agromafia; Anthropocene; Consumption
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.