Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/labels-for-animal-husbandry-systems-meet-consumer-preferences-results-gWrm3Eod4A
References (69)
-
L. Heerwagen, M. Mørkbak, S. Denver, P. Sandøe, T. Christensen (2015)
The Role of Quality Labels in Market-Driven Animal WelfareJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28
-
B. Sørensen, M. Barcellos, N. Olsen, W. Verbeke, J. Scholderer (2012)
Systems of attitudes towards production in the pork industry. A cross-national studyAppetite, 59
-
R. Masterson, D. Pickton (2004)
Marketing : An Introduction -
L. Marian, J. Thøgersen (2013)
Direct and mediated impacts of product and process characteristics on consumers’ choice of organic vs. conventional chickenFood Quality and Preference, 29
-
J. Spooner, Catherine Schuppli, D. Fraser (2014)
Attitudes of Canadian Citizens Toward Farm Animal Welfare: A Qualitative StudyLivestock Science, 163
-
A. Gracia, M. Loureiro, R. Nayga (2011)
Valuing an EU Animal Welfare Label using Experimental AuctionsAgricultural Economics, 42
-
B. Roe, I. Sheldon (2007)
Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy ApproachesComparative Political Economy: Regulation eJournal
-
D. Dentoni, G. Tonsor, R. Calantone, H. Peterson (2014)
Disentangling direct and indirect effects of credence labelsBritish Food Journal, 116
-
F. Vanhonacker, W. Verbeke, E. Poucke, S. Buijs, F. Tuyttens (2009)
Societal concern related to stocking density, pen size and group size in farm animal productionLivestock Science, 123
-
F. Carlsson, P. Frykblom, C. Lagerkvist (2005)
Consumer Preferences for Food Product Quality Attributes from Swedish Agriculture, 34
-
Ariane Kehlbacher, R. Bennett, K. Balcombe (2012)
Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labellingFood Policy, 37
-
W. Verbeke, F. Perez-Cueto, M. Barcellos, A. Krystallis, K. Grunert (2010)
European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.Meat science, 84 2
-
Adrian Uzea, J. Hobbs, Jing Zhang (2011)
Activists and Animal Welfare: Quality Verifications in the Canadian Pork SectorJournal of Agricultural Economics, 62
-
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. Altman (2010)
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.International journal of surgery, 8 5
-
M. Janssen, U. Hamm (2012)
Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logosFood Quality and Preference, 25
-
G. Tonsor, C. Wolf (2011)
On mandatory labeling of animal welfare attributesFood Policy, 36
-
F. Vanhonacker, E. Poucke, F. Tuyttens, W. Verbeke (2010)
Citizens’ Views on Farm Animal Welfare and Related Information Provision: Exploratory Insights from Flanders, BelgiumJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23
-
D Moher, A Liberati, J Tetzlaff, DG Altman (2009)
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statementPLoS Med, 6
-
V. Pozo, G. Tonsor, T. Schroeder (2012)
How Choice Experiment Design Affects Estimated Valuation of Use of Gestation CratesJournal of Agricultural Economics, 63
-
F. Mesías, M. Escribano, A. Ledesma, F. Pulido (2005)
Consumers' preferences for beef in the Spanish region of Extremadura: a study using conjoint analysisJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85
-
G. Jahn, M. Schramm, A. Spiller (2005)
The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy ToolJournal of Consumer Policy, 28
-
M. McKendree, N. Widmar, David Ortega, K. Foster (2013)
Consumer Preferences for Verified Pork-Rearing Practices in the Production of Ham ProductsJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 38
-
N. Olynk, David Ortega (2013)
Consumer preferences for verified dairy cattle management practices in processed dairy productsFood Control, 30
-
J. Pasquale, E. Nannoni, Isabella Duca, F. Adinolfi, F. Capitanio, L. Sardi, M. Vitali, G. Martelli (2014)
What Foods are Identified as Animal Friendly by Italian Consumers?Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13
-
A. Krystallis, M. Barcellos, J. Kügler, W. Verbeke, K. Grunert (2009)
Attitudes of European citizens towards pig production systems.Livestock Science, 126
-
S. García-Torres, A. López-Gajardo, F. Mesías (2016)
Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis.Meat science, 114
-
Eric Dransfield, T. Ngapo, Niels Nielsen, L. Bredahl, P. Sjödén, Maria Magnusson, M. Campo, G. Nute (2005)
Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production.Meat science, 69 1
-
E. Loo, Vincenzina Caputo, R. Nayga, W. Verbeke (2014)
Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meatFood Policy, 49
-
M. Darby, E. Karni (1973)
Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of FraudThe Journal of Law and Economics, 16
-
V. Sandilands (2006)
Public attitudes to the welfare of broiler chickensAnimal Welfare
-
Clarissa Cardoso, M. Hötzel, D. Weary, J. Robbins, M. Keyserlingk (2016)
Imagining the ideal dairy farm.Journal of dairy science, 99 2
-
Brian Naald, T. Cameron (2011)
Willingness to pay for other species' well-beingEcological Economics, 70
-
E. Pouta, J. Heikkilä, Sari Forsman-Hugg, Merja Isoniemi, J. Mäkelä (2010)
Consumer choice of broiler meat: the effects of country of origin and production methods.Food Quality and Preference, 21
-
S. Hamilton, D. Zilberman (2006)
Green markets, eco-certification, and equilibrium fraudJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52
-
J. Jonge, I. Lans, H. Trijp (2015)
Different shades of grey: Compromise products to encourage animal friendly consumptionFood Quality and Preference, 45
-
L. Elbakidze, R. Nayga, Hao Li (2013)
Willingness to Pay for Multiple Quantities of Animal Welfare Dairy Products: Results from Random Nth‐, Second‐Price, and Incremental Second‐Price AuctionsCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie, 61
-
M. Mørkbak, T. Christensen, D. Gyrd-Hansen (2010)
Consumer preferences for safety characteristics in pork.British Food Journal, 112
-
B. Boogaard, L. Boekhorst, S. Oosting, J. Sørensen (2011)
Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: Citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and DenmarkLivestock Science, 140
-
J. Jonge, H. Trijp (2014)
Heterogeneity in consumer perceptions of the animal friendliness of broiler production systemsFood Policy, 49
-
R. Weinrich, Sarah Kühl, A. Zühlsdorf, A. Spiller (2014)
Consumer Attitudes in Germany towards Different Dairy Housing Systems and Their Implications for the Marketing of Pasture Raised MilkThe International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 17
-
Carolina Liljenstolpe (2011)
Demand for value‐added pork in Sweden: a latent class model approachAgribusiness, 27
-
M. Teisl, B. Roe (1998)
The Economics of Labeling: An Overview of Issues for Health and Environmental DisclosureAgricultural and Resource Economics Review, 27
-
(2014)
Analyses into consumers’ willingness to pay a certain price in multi-level labelling systems: The animal welfare label as an example -
L. Koistinen, E. Pouta, J. Heikkilä, Sari Forsman-Hugg, Jaana Kotro, J. Mäkelä, M. Niva (2013)
The impact of fat content, production methods and carbon footprint information on consumer preferences for minced meatFood Quality and Preference, 29
-
R. Prickett (2010)
Consumer preferences for farm animal welfare: results from a telephone survey of US householdsAnimal Welfare
-
L. Elbakidze, R. Nayga (2012)
The effects of information on willingness to pay for animal welfare in dairy production: application of nonhypothetical valuation mechanisms.Journal of dairy science, 95 3
-
K. Ellis, K. Billington, B. McNeil, D. McKeegan (2009)
Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfareAnimal Welfare
-
Carolina Liljenstolpe (2005)
Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig productionAgribusiness, 24
-
W. Sepúlveda, M. Maza, L. Pardos (2011)
Aspects of quality related to the consumption and production of lamb meat. Consumers versus producers.Meat science, 87 4
-
Lorelei Michel, S. Anders, W. Wismer (2011)
Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.Journal of food science, 76 8
-
B. Boogaard, S. Oosting, B. Bock (2008)
Defining sustainability as a socio-cultural concept: Citizen panels visiting dairy farms in the NetherlandsLivestock Science, 117
-
(2016)
Länderberichte: Verbraucherschützer fordern klarere Tierschutzkennzeichnungen -
Inês Viegas, L. Nunes, Lívia Madureira, M. Fontes, J. Santos (2014)
Beef Credence Attributes: Implications of Substitution Effects on Consumers’ WTPJournal of Agricultural Economics, 65
-
(2015)
Markt Bilanz Eier und Geflügel -
F. Vanhonacker, W. Verbeke (2014)
Public and Consumer Policies for Higher Welfare Food Products: Challenges and OpportunitiesJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27
-
L Elbakidze, RM Nayga, H Li (2013)
Willingness to pay for multiple quantities of animal welfare dairy productsCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D’Agroeconomie, 61
-
C. Hoogland, J. Boer, J. Boersema (2007)
Food and sustainability: Do consumers recognize, understand and value on-package information on production standards?Appetite, 49
-
on the registration of establishments keeping laying hens, covered by Council Directive 1999/74/EC -
(2015)
Product and price differentiation for beef according to rearing system of cattle -
N. Olynk, G. Tonsor, C. Wolf (2010)
Consumer Willingness to Pay for Livestock Credence Attribute Claim VerificationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35
-
T. Tempesta, D. Vecchiato (2013)
An analysis of the territorial factors affecting milk purchase in ItalyFood Quality and Preference, 27
-
T. Bergstra, B. Gremmen, E. Stassen (2015)
Moral Values and Attitudes Toward Dutch Sow HusbandryJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28
-
Tomas Nilsson, K. Foster, J. Lusk (2006)
Marketing Opportunities for Certified Pork ChopsCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie, 54
-
B Roe, I Sheldon (2007)
Credence good labelling: The efficiency and distributional implications of several policy approachesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89
-
F. Caracciolo, G. Cicia, T. Giudice, L. Cembalo, A. Krystallis, K. Grunert, P. Lombardi (2016)
Human values and preferences for cleaner livestock productionJournal of Cleaner Production, 112
-
Janneke Jonge, Hans Trijp (2013)
The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare.Poultry science, 92 12
-
A. Gracia (2013)
The determinants of the intention to purchase animal welfare-friendly meat products in SpainAnimal Welfare, 22
-
L. Frewer, A. Kole, S. Kroon, C. Lauwere (2005)
Consumer Attitudes Towards the Development of Animal-Friendly Husbandry SystemsJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18
-
(2001)
Economics of food labelling
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2016 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
- Subject
- Philosophy; Ethics; Evolutionary Biology; Agricultural Economics; Theory of Medicine/Bioethics; Plant Sciences
- ISSN
- 1187-7863
- eISSN
- 1573-322X
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10806-016-9647-2
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Political decision-makers in the European Union (EU) are currently discussing the introduction of a mandatory uniform labelling scheme for meat and milk that provides information on husbandry systems similar to the already existent labelling scheme in the EU egg market. The objective of this paper was to assess whether such information is relevant to consumers when buying meat and milk. The paper was based on a systematic synthesis of 53 scientific journal articles on empirical consumer studies. The review revealed that consumers perceived the aspects of outdoor access, stocking density and floor type as important factors influencing animal welfare. On average, consumers not only had a positive attitude towards more animal welfare-friendly husbandry systems with outdoor access and space allowance but were also willing to pay a price premium for products from such systems. All studies on consumer segmentation identified at least one consumer segment that placed great importance on animal welfare-friendly husbandry systems. Interestingly, many studies identified one or more other segments who still had a significant preference for animal welfare-friendly products even though other product attributes were more important to them. Based on the findings, the paper presents conclusions regarding the labelling of husbandry systems for meat and milk.
Journal
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 16, 2016