Language Before Stonewall : Conclusions
Leap, William L.
2019-12-27 00:00:00
[This chapter concludes the books’ discussion, arguing that—as a primary point, Language Before Stonewall shows multiple ways to confirm the presence of a language of queerness before Stonewall, whose presence cannot be fully contained within “the right way to tell the story” about the Stonewall moment. Disrupting the privileged narrative and the Stonewall excesses that this narrative promotes is one of the tasks that queer historical linguistics must address, as QHL works to describe the details of linguistic practice before.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/language-before-stonewall-conclusions-8wtCTQB3cl
[This chapter concludes the books’ discussion, arguing that—as a primary point, Language Before Stonewall shows multiple ways to confirm the presence of a language of queerness before Stonewall, whose presence cannot be fully contained within “the right way to tell the story” about the Stonewall moment. Disrupting the privileged narrative and the Stonewall excesses that this narrative promotes is one of the tasks that queer historical linguistics must address, as QHL works to describe the details of linguistic practice before.]
Published: Dec 27, 2019
Recommended Articles
Loading...
There are no references for this article.
Share the Full Text of this Article with up to 5 Colleagues for FREE
Sign up for your 14-Day Free Trial Now!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.