Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Voluminous Paleoproterozoic gneissic granites occur in the Liaoji belt in the North China Craton (NCC), which were intruded by mafic dykes, and experienced a late-stage amphibolite facies metamorphism. These granites were thought by some researchers to be A-type granites and formed in a continental rifting setting. We propose a different model for the origin of these granites and the tectonic setting, based on the integrated field, petrographic, geochronological, and geochemical studies on a couple of gneissic granite plutons. The gneissic granites were emplaced at 2173–2203 Ma, and the mafic dykes at ca. 2159 Ma, followed by an amphibolite facies metamorphism at ca. 1.9 Ga. The gneissic granites contain mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs), calcium hornblendes, magnesiohorblendes, accessory titanite, and pyrrhotite. They show calc-alkaline arc magma affinity, with A/CNK = 0.9 − 1.2 (mostly less than 1.1), A/NK = 0.9 − 1.4, SiO2 = 68.3 − 76.9 wt%, low contents of TiO2 (<0.3 wt%), enrichment of LILEs, such as K, Rb, Sr, Cs, depletion of some HFSEs, such as Nb, Ti. These characteristics suggest that these gneissic granites are I-type granites formed probably in a subduction zone. The A-type-like characteristics for some granites (the Dafangshen granite) are attributable to the highly evolved nature of the pluton as shown by the high SiO2 contents (76.7–77.1 wt%), which could have been caused by the high boron contents of the pluton, because addition of boron in magma system tends to prolong magma evolution and lead to significant differentiation. The large variation of whole-rock εNd(t) values (−8.6 to 1.5) and zircon εHf(t) values (−1.3 to 5.6), together with the existence and petrographic features of the MMEs, and oscillatory zoning in plagioclase, suggest that mixing/mingling of lower crust-derived felsic magma with enriched mantle-derived mafic magma might have resulted in formation of these gneissic granites. The existence of Archean inherited zircons in these granites together with the arc affinity suggests a northward subduction for the JLJB in the Paleoproterozoic times.]
Published: Jul 23, 2016
Keywords: Gneissic granites; Subduction; Arc magmatism; Paleoproterozoic; North China Craton
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.