Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Despite the diversity of managed realignment approaches adopted in different countries, there are certain elements of commonality that provide relevant lessons that can be applicable to facilitate and improve the implementation of managed realignment in general. Public perception and stakeholders’ engagement are often cited as a factor limiting the wider implementation of managed realignment. Considering the scale and importance of managed realignment in national and regional strategies in many countries, gaining wider public acceptance is fundamental. To take adequate actions that can improve social uptake of managed realignment, it is first necessary to understand the differences between public perception and the current knowledge of practitioners and researchers. This chapter describes the current thinking of researchers and practitioners about the potential, performance and limitations of managed realignment and contrasts these with the perception of stakeholders. Critical differences are identified and ways to address these with the aim to increase the social acceptance of managed realignment are suggested.]
Published: Jul 15, 2014
Keywords: Flood Risk; Project Design; Suitable Land; Social Perception; Public Acceptance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.