Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
collectif ComMod (2005)
La modélisation comme outil d'accompagnementNatures Sciences Sociétés, 13
W. Dare, O. Barreteau (2003)
A role-playing game in irrigated system negotiation: between play and realityJ. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 6
R. Letcher, B. Croke, A. Jakeman, W. Merritt (2006)
An integrated modelling toolbox for water resources assessment and management in highland catchments: Model descriptionAgricultural Systems, 89
I. Touré, Alassane Bah, P. D'Aquino, I. Dia (2004)
Savoirs experts et savoirs locaux pour la coélaboration d'outils cartographiques d'aide à la décisionCahiers Agricultures, 13
Ndeye Mar, G. Magrin (2008)
Peut-on décentraliser des ressources naturelles stratégiques ?. L'articulation des niveaux de gestion autour du lac de Guiers (Sénégal), 141
P D’Aquino (2001)
Ni planification locale, ni aménagement du territoire: pour une nouvelle approche de la planification territorialeGéogr Econ Soc, 3
J. Stoorvogel, J. Antle (2001)
Regional land use analysis : the development of operational toolsAgricultural Systems, 70
T. Schmitt (1993)
L'impôt foncier, l'espace rural et l'environnement
B. Walker, S. Carpenter, J. Anderies, N. Abel, G. Cumming, M. Janssen, L. Lebel, J. Norberg, Garry Peterson, Rusty Pritchard (2002)
Resilience Management in Social-ecological Systems: a Working Hypothesis for a Participatory ApproachConservation Ecology, 6
P. Verburg, W. Soepboer, A. Veldkamp, Ramil Limpiada, Victoria Espaldon, S. Mastura (2002)
Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Regional Land Use: The CLUE-S ModelEnvironmental Management, 30
S. Seck, P. Valarié (2005)
ATP DOMINO. Acteurs, utilisation des ressources et gestion de l'espace dans la région du lac de Guiers : éléments de contribution au diagnostic des enjeux politiques
K. Kok, P. Verburg, T. Veldkamp (2007)
Integrated assessment of the land system: the future of land use, 10
Giorgio Blundo (1998)
Logiques de Gestion Publique dans la Décentralisation Sénégalaise : Participation Factionnelle et Ubiquité Réticulaire
Jay Johnson, R. Louis, A. Pramono (2005)
Facing the Future: Encouraging Critical Cartographic Literacies In Indigenous CommunitiesACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 4
A. Bah, I. Toure, C. Page, A. Ickowicz, A. Diop (2006)
An agent-based model to understand the multiple uses of land and resources around drillings in SahelMath. Comput. Model., 44
L. Boutinot, A. Viau, G. Leclerc (2008)
Questions sur la neutralité des outils de type jeux de rôle et cartographie participative dans une expérience de gouvernance foncière au Sénégal
W. Daré, S. Aubert, Alassane Bah, A. Botta, Ibrahima Diop-Gaye, C. Fourage, G. Lajoie, G. Leclerc (2008)
Difficultés de la participation en recherche-action : retour d'expériences de modélisation d'accompagnement en appui à l'aménagement du territoire au Sénégal et à la Réunion, 8
J. Castella, S. Kam, D. Quang, P. Verburg, C. Hoanh (2007)
Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/cover change to support public policies: Application to sustainable management of natural resources in northern VietnamLand Use Policy, 24
G. Leclerc, C. Hall (2007)
Making World Development Work: Scientific Alternatives to Neoclassical Economic Theory
W. Merritt, B. Croke, A. Jakeman, R. Letcher, P. Perez (2004)
A Biophysical Toolbox for assessment and management of land and water resources in rural catchments in Northern ThailandEcological Modelling, 171
L. Boutinot, C. Diouf (2006)
Quand certaines approches participatives engendrent des formes ambiguës de mobilisation de la société civile : quelques exemples à propos de la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal
J. Ribot, A. Agrawal, A. Larson (2006)
Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resourcesWorld Development, 34
O. Barreteau (2003)
Our Companion Modelling ApproachJ. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 6
J. Ribot (1995)
From exclusion to participation: Turning Senegal's forestry policy around?World Development, 23
P. D'Aquino, C. Page, François Bousquet, A. Bah (2002)
A novel mediating participatory modelling: the self-design process to accompany collective decision makingInternational Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2
J. Novak (1991)
Clarify with Concept Maps.The Science Teacher, 58
Janine Nahapiet, S. Ghoshal (1998)
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational AdvantageAcademy of Management Review, 23
O. Barreteau, François Bousquet, J. Attonaty (2001)
Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systemsJ. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 4
R. Argent, R. Grayson (2003)
A modelling shell for participatory assessment and management of natural resourcesEnviron. Model. Softw., 18
P. D'Aquino (2001)
Ni planification locale, ni aménagement du territoire : pour une nouvelle approche de la planification territorialeGéographie Économie Société
N. Bécu, A. Neef, P. Schreinemachers, C. Sangkapitux (2008)
Participatory computer simulation to support collective decision-making: Potential and limits of stakeholder involvementLand Use Policy, 25
S. Earl, F. Carden, T. Smutylo (2002)
Outcome mapping : building learning and reflection into development programs [Arabic version]
A. Paassen, R. Roetter, H. Keulen, C. Hoanh (2007)
Can computer models stimulate learning about sustainable land use? Experience with LUPAS in the humid (sub-)tropics of AsiaAgricultural Systems, 94
G. Parker, R. Droste, K. Kennedy (2008)
Modeling the effect of agricultural best management practices on water quality under various climatic scenariosJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 7
S. Diouf, S. Fall, B. Barbier, G. Leclerc (2007)
ATP DOMINO. Modélisation bioéconomique dans la région du lac de Guiers. 3, Impact des prévisions météorologiques sur les stratégies paysannes
J. Castella, P. Verburg (2007)
Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of VietnamEcological Modelling, 202
Alexandre Ickowicz, V. Ancey, G. Leclerc, I. Touré, Grégory Damman, S. Darly (2005)
Programme LEAD "Pastoralisme et environnement au Sahel" : (PESah). Rapport final
Pierre Bourdieu (2012)
Le capital social
B. Barry (1973)
Le royaume du Waalo : le Sénégal avant la conquêteInternational Journal of African Historical Studies, 6
P. Duboscq (1972)
La mobilité rurale en Aquitaine. [Essai d'analyse logique]: Essai d'analyse logique, 1
N. Faysse (2006)
Troubles on the way: An analysis of the challenges faced by multi-stakeholder platformsNatural Resources Forum, 30
P. D'Aquino, C. Page, François Bousquet, A. Bah (2003)
Using Self-Designed Role-Playing Games and a Multi-Agent System to Empower a Local Decision-Making Process for Land Use Management: The SelfCormas Experiment in SenegalJ. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 6
P. D'Aquino, S. Seck, S. Camara (2002)
Un SIG conçu par les acteurs : l'opération pilote POAS au Sénégal, 31
L Boutinot, A Viau, G Leclerc (2008)
Jeux de rôle et cartographie: la question de la neutralité des outils dans des dispositifs de gouvernance participative des territoires en AfriqueNOROIS, 209
A. Bâ, X. Cogels (1983)
Le Lac de Guiers : problematique d'environnement et de developpement
We describe an action-research project whose objective was to help stakeholders at different organisational levels achieve sustainable land management by developing mediation models and tools. We chose to test a specific approach called companion modelling in the framework of a multidisciplinary research partnership and a formal local partnership (a ‘users committee’) involving an array of stakeholders at different organisational levels. The study area covers 10,000 km2 of agro-pastoral land around Lake Guiers in northern Senegal. We conducted studies to update the knowledge base of the area and organised six field workshops that clearly revealed three important tool functions to support decision-making on land use at different scales, i.e. understanding maps, monitoring and evaluating land tenure, and foreseeing changes in land use. We found that a toolbox approach was the best way to implement the three functions and overcome the constraints faced by the research team and those linked to the timing of the project. Therefore, we produced five simple complementary tools aimed at various users: a farm-level optimisation model (for researchers and technical services), a database for land allocations and a discussion tool to assess the impact of land allocation decisions (for the rural council), a paper atlas (for local players) and a regional land use change simulation model (for regional and national planners). Participants were able to work with paper maps, to interpret computer-generated simulations of land use change and understand the strengths and limitations of each. Self-assessment of the research process emphasised the importance of the context and the critical role played by social capital at both the research and the field level, which, in turn, emphasised the need for major improvements in the design and implementation of a quality process for participatory modelling. It turns out that action-research may be an effective way to undertake sustainability science.
Sustainability Science – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 18, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.