Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[I suggest a historico-philosophical overview, assessment and explanation of the variety of materialism that was developed from the late 1950s onwards in Australia, primarily by U.T. Place, J.J.C. Smart, and D.M. Armstrong. These authors spoke less of “materialism” and more of an “identity theory,” that is, a theory concerning the nature of the relation between brain and mind – not matter and mind in general, notice – which they wished to show was an “identity.” In order to explain, survey and assess this intellectual episode I examine some of its roots in the Vienna Circle (its closest ‘correspondent’ in the United States was Herbert Feigl, who had been a member of the Vienna logical positivists), the way in which it reacted to behaviorism, and its ‘success’ in Anglo-Saxon philosophy of mind in the years since then. Having done so, I evaluate the pertinence and novelty of this kind of materialism in relation to philosophical materialism more broadly defined, and this will lead me to formulate some criticisms of the Identity Theory.]
Published: Jan 7, 2016
Keywords: Identity Theory; Materialist Theory; Brain Process; Mental Life; Contingent Identity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.