Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Brock (1993)
Life and Death: Philosophical Essays in Biomedical Ethics
Allen Buchanan, D. Brock, Norman Daniels, D. Wikler (2000)
From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice
N. Agar (2004)
Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement
P. Rabinow (1999)
French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory
F. Ewald (1990)
Norms, Discipline, and the LawRepresentations, 30
S. Tremain (2005)
Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in UteroHypatia, 21
John Harris (2001)
One principle and three fallacies of disability studiesJournal of Medical Ethics, 27
P. Rabinow (2007)
Marking Time: On the Anthropology of the Contemporary
L. Bortolotti, J. Harris (2006)
Disability, enhancement and the harm -benefit continuum
B. Latour, S. Woolgar (1979)
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
K. Goldstein (1934)
The Organism: A Holistic Approach to Biology Derived from Pathological Data in Man
N. Agar (2006)
The debate over liberal eugenics.The Hastings Center report, 36 2
Christopher Boorse (1977)
Health as a Theoretical ConceptPhilosophy of Science, 44
N. Daniels (1985)
Just Health Care
R. Amundson (2000)
Against Normal FunctionStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31
J. Habermas (2003)
The Future of Human Nature
E. Keller (1999)
Making sense of life : explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines
P. Guttorp, I. Hacking (1992)
The Taming of Chance.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87
F. Fukuyama (2002)
Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution
L. Cole, P. Kitcher, Simonand Schuster (1996)
The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human PossibilitiesBioScience
J. Feinberg (2015)
The Child's Right to an Open Future
J. Zylinska (2010)
Playing God, Playing Adam: The Politics and Ethics of EnhancementJournal of Bioethical Inquiry, 7
Elselijn Kingma (2007)
What is it to be healthy?Analysis, 67 294
John Harris (2007)
Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People
M. Baily (2006)
Talking to each other about universal health care: do values belong in the discussion?The Hastings Center report, 36 6
J. Butler (1995)
Bodies that matter : on the discursive limits of sexContemporary Sociology, 24
G. Canguilhem (1978)
On the Normal and the Pathological
D. Fox (2007)
THE ILLIBERALITY OF ‘LIBERAL EUGENICS’Ratio, 20
[In this chapter, I examine the uses to which the concept of the normal is put in debates on liberal eugenics and human enhancement. I discuss three particular approaches to human nature and the normal: Jürgen Habermas’s emphasis on human nature as a normative concept that grounds the moral distinction between therapy and enhancement; the use of the ‘normal species function’ model of normality by Allen Buchanan and his co-authors; and finally, John Harris’s rejection of normality and consequent embrace of enhancement technologies. Following this, I draw on the work of Georges Canguilhem to outline a conception of the normal that would avoid the worries that hound Habermas’s normative account of human nature, while still allowing for a distinction between therapy and enhancement.]
Published: May 23, 2015
Keywords: Human Nature; Normative Conception; Genetic Intervention; Normal Species; Human Enhancement
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.