Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/mining-supervised-classification-performance-studies-a-meta-analytic-5KJqo4WzyT
References (38)
-
D. Hand (2004)
Academic Obsessions and Classification Realities: Ignoring Practicalities in Supervised Classification -
D. Hand (1982)
Discrimination and Classification -
R. Fisher (1936)
THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMSAnnals of Human Genetics, 7
-
Adrien Jamain, D. Hand (2005)
The Naive Bayes Mystery: A classification detective storyPattern Recognit. Lett., 26
-
B. Ripley, N. Hjort (1996)
Pattern recognition and neural networks -
Peter Hooper (1999)
Reference Point Logistic ClassificationJournal of Classification, 16
-
L. RENDELL, R. SESHU (1990)
earning Hard Concepts Through Constructive InductionComputational Intelligence, 6
-
T. HASTIE, R. TIBSHIRANI, J. FRIEDMAN (2001)
The Elements of Statistical Learning Theory -
S.P. CURRAM, J. MINGERS (1994)
Neural Networks, Decision Tree Induction and Discriminant AnalysisJournal of Operational Research Society, 45
-
S.Y. SOHN (1999)
Meta-analysis of Classification Algorithms for Pattern RecognitionIEEE Transactions on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, 21
-
Huan Liu (1996)
Book review: Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification Edited by D. Michie, D.J. Spiegelhalter and C.C. Taylor (Ellis Horwood Limited, 1994)Intelligence\/sigart Bulletin, 7
-
M. Berthold, J. Diamond (1998)
Constructive training of probabilistic neural networksNeurocomputing, 19
-
D. Sargent (2001)
Comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approachesCancer, 91
-
T.M. MITCHELL (1997)
Machine Learning -
Thomas Dietterich (2000)
An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods for Constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees: Bagging, Boosting, and RandomizationMachine Learning, 40
-
A. Webb (1999)
Statistical Pattern Recognition -
G. McLachlan (1992)
Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition -
T. Lim, Wei-Yin Loh, Yu-Shan Shih (2000)
A Comparison of Prediction Accuracy, Complexity, and Training Time of Thirty-Three Old and New Classification AlgorithmsMachine Learning, 40
-
P. Brazdil, Carlos Soares, J. Costa (2003)
Ranking Learning Algorithms: Using IBL and Meta-Learning on Accuracy and Time ResultsMachine Learning, 50
-
D. Michie, D. Spiegelhalter, Charles Taylor (2009)
Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification -
R.A. FISHER (1936)
The Use of Multiple Measurements in Taxonomic ProblemsAnnals of Eugenics, 7
-
Rosa Schiavo, D. Hand (2000)
Ten More Years of Error Rate ResearchInternational Statistical Review, 68
-
R. Bradley, M. Terry (1952)
RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONSBiometrika, 39
-
L. Rendell, R. Seshu (1990)
Learning hard concepts through constructive induction: framework and rationaleComputational Intelligence, 6
-
D. Hand, H. Mannila, Padhraic Smyth (2007)
Principles of Data MiningDrug Safety, 30
-
G. McLachlan (2005)
Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition: McLachlan/Discriminant Analysis & Pattern Recog -
K. Fukunaga (1972)
Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition -
E. Kleinberg (2000)
On the Algorithmic Implementation of Stochastic DiscriminationIEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 22
-
S. Sohn (1999)
Meta Analysis of Classification Algorithms for Pattern RecognitionIEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 21
-
R. Bradley, M. Terry (1952)
Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired ComparisonsBiometrika, 39
-
Peter Eklund, A. Hoang, Peter Eklund (2007)
A Performance Survey of Public Domain Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms -
S. Curram, J. Mingers (1994)
Neural Networks, Decision Tree Induction and Discriminant Analysis: an Empirical ComparisonJournal of the Operational Research Society, 45
-
D. Collett (1991)
Modelling Binary DataTechnometrics, 46
-
W. Linden, R. Hambleton (1997)
Handbook of Modern Item Response TheoryBiometrics, 54
-
W. Thompson, H. David (1966)
The method of paired comparisons -
R. Duin (1996)
A note on comparing classifiersPattern Recognit. Lett., 17
-
J. Blue, G. Candela, P. Grother, R. Chellappa, Charles Wilson (1994)
Evaluation of pattern classifiers for fingerprint and OCR applicationsPattern Recognit., 27
-
D. Hand (1997)
Construction and Assessment of Classification Rules
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2008 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
- Subject
- Statistics; Marketing ; Psychometrics; Signal, Image and Speech Processing; Bioinformatics; Pattern Recognition; Statistical Theory and Methods
- ISSN
- 0176-4268
- eISSN
- 1432-1343
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00357-008-9003-y
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
There have been many comparative studies of classification methods in which real datasets are used as a gauge to assess the relative performance of the methods. Since these comparisons often yield inconclusive or limited results on how methods perform, it is often believed that a broader approach combining these studies would shed some light on this difficult question. This paper describes such an attempt: we have sampled the available literature and created a dataset of 5807 classification results. We show that one of the possible ways to analyze the resulting data is an overall assessment of the classification methods, and we present methods for that particular aim. The merits and demerits of such an approach are discussed, and conclusions are drawn which may assist future research: we argue that the current state of the literature hardly allows large-scale investigations.
Journal
Journal of Classification – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 26, 2008