Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Modal Justification via TheoriesTheory Selection

Modal Justification via Theories: Theory Selection [This chapter begins Part II. In it, I develop a general framework for selecting between competing modal epistemologies, focusing on three desiderata that are especially relevant to our choice: conservatism, simplicity, and the ability to handle modal disagreement. Unsurprisingly, I argue that TEM fares well in the relevant respects. However, I’ll also distinguish the senses in which TEM is and isn’t conservative, eventually describing TEM’s disagreement with some modal intuitions as its cautiousness. This requires further discussion in subsequent chapters.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Modal Justification via TheoriesTheory Selection

Part of the Synthese Library Book Series (volume 380)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/modal-justification-via-theories-theory-selection-yF8UjnMpca
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
ISBN
978-3-319-49126-4
Pages
61 –79
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-49127-1_4
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter begins Part II. In it, I develop a general framework for selecting between competing modal epistemologies, focusing on three desiderata that are especially relevant to our choice: conservatism, simplicity, and the ability to handle modal disagreement. Unsurprisingly, I argue that TEM fares well in the relevant respects. However, I’ll also distinguish the senses in which TEM is and isn’t conservative, eventually describing TEM’s disagreement with some modal intuitions as its cautiousness. This requires further discussion in subsequent chapters.]

Published: Dec 16, 2016

Keywords: Modal Disagreement; Simple Hypothesis; Metaphysical Theory; Metaphysical Possibility; Modal Knowledge

There are no references for this article.