Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Kakwani (1977)
Applications of Lorenz Curves in Economic AnalysisEconometrica, 45
(1984)
Decomposing Theil’s Index of Income Inequality into Between and Within
J. Durbin (1954)
Errors in variables, 22
N. Bhattacharya, B. Mahalanobis (1967)
Regional Disparities in Household Consumption in IndiaJournal of the American Statistical Association, 62
R. Salas (2002)
Multilevel interterritorial convergence and additive multidimensional inequality decompositionSocial Choice and Welfare, 19
(1993)
A New Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient among Groups and its Interpretation with Applications to Australia
I. Adelman, Amnon Levy (1984)
DECOMPOSING THEIL'S INCOME OF INCOME INEQUALITY INTO BETWEEN AND WITHIN COMPONENTS: A NOTEReview of Income and Wealth, 30
Q. Wodon (1999)
Between Group Inequality and Targeted TransfersReview of Income and Wealth, 45
T. Toyoda (1980)
DECOMPOSABILITY OF INEQUALITY MEASURESThe Economic studies quarterly, 31
G. Pyatt (1976)
On the interpretation and disaggregation of GINI coefficientsThe Economic Journal, 86
I. Adelman, Amnon Levy (1986)
Decomposing Theil's Index of Income Inequality: A ReplyReview of Income and Wealth, 32
W. Silver (1967)
Economics and Information TheoryJournal of the Operational Research Society, 18
V. Rao (1969)
Two Decompositions of Concentration Ratio, 132
T. Toyoda (1987)
Tax Progressivity and Measures of its Redistributive ImpactEconometric Reviews, 38
(1969)
Two Decompositions of Concentration Ratios
C. Dagum (1997)
A new approach to the decomposition of the Gini income inequality ratioEmpirical Economics, 22
I. Olkin, S. Yitzhaki (1992)
Gini Regression AnalysisInternational Statistical Review, 60
F. Bourguignon (1979)
Decomposable Income Inequality MeasuresEconometrica, 47
F. Cowell (1985)
MULTILEVEL DECOMPOSITION OF THEIL'S INDEX OF INEQUALITYReview of Income and Wealth, 31
(1967)
Decomposability of Inequality Measure
T. Toyoda (1994)
Concentration Curves and the Methods of Measuring ElasticitiesEconometric Reviews, 45
A. Fishlow (1972)
Brazilian Size Distribution of IncomeThe American Economic Review, 62
Abstract This paper studies the multilevel decomposability of the respective income inequality measures proposed by Theil, Rao and Bahattacharya–Maharanobis. All the methods can be decomposed into multilevels if and only if each lower level subgroup belongs to only one particular higher level group. We found not only analytically but also empirically that the residual in the decomposed Bahattacharya–Maharanobis measure tends to increase when the decomposition levels increase. We conclude that Theil’s and Rao’s decompositions have advantages in empirical analysis and that the choice of the decomposition methods depends on the purpose of the analysis.
The Japanese Economic Review – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 2009
Keywords: economics, general; microeconomics; macroeconomics/monetary economics//financial economics; econometrics; development economics; economic history
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.