Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Toshihiro Matsumura (1998)
Partial privatization in mixed duopolyJournal of Public Economics, 70
Richard Harris, Elmer Wiens (1980)
Government Enterprise: An Instrument for the Internal Regulation of IndustryCanadian Journal of Economics, 13
J Stiglitz (1987)
Public sector economics
Nirvikar Singh, X. Vives (1984)
Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopolyThe RAND Journal of Economics, 15
D. Bös (1991)
Privatization: A Theoretical Treatment
F. Delbono, L. Lambertini (2014)
Nationalization as Credible Threat Against Tacit CollusionIO: Theory eJournal
A. Dinar (2011)
Strategic behavior and the environment
H. Cremer, M. Marchand, Jacques-François Thisse (1989)
The public firm as an instrument for regulating an oligopolistic market, 41
A. Rapoport, T. Schelling (1961)
The Strategy of Conflict.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56
D. Dragone, L. Lambertini, A. Palestini (2011)
Regulating Environmental Externalities Through Public Firms: A Differential GameERN: Other Game Theory & Bargaining Theory (Topic)
G. Fraja, F. Delbono (1990)
GAME THEORETIC MODELS OF MIXED OLIGOPOLYJournal of Economic Surveys, 4
G. Fraja, F. Delbono (1989)
ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES OF A PUBLIC ENTERPRISE IN OLIGOPOLY, 41
(1966)
Government firms in oligopoly industries
D Dragone, L Lambertini, A Palestini (2014)
Regulating environmental externalities through public firms: a differential gameStrategic Behavior and the Environment, 4
H. Cremer, M. Marchand, Jacques-François Thisse (1991)
Mixed Oligopoly With Differentiated ProductsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 9
(1987)
Oligopoly, public firm and welfare maximization: a game-theoretic analysis
J. Brabant (1997)
Privatization–An Economic AnalysisComparative Economic Studies, 39
F. Delbono, C. Scarpa (1995)
Upward Sloping Reaction Functions under Quantity Competition in Mixed OligopoliesBulletin of Economic Research, 47
G. Fraja, P. Valbonesi (2009)
Mixed oligopoly: Old and new
Within a simple model of differentiated oligopoly, we show that tacit collusion may be prevented by the threat of nationalising a private firm coupled with the appropriate choice of the weight given to private profits in the maximand of the nationalised company. This happens because the threat of nationalization eliminates the prisoners’ dilemma usually associated with a Cournot game among profit-seekers. We characterise the properties of such a threat and prove that it may allow the policy maker to credibly deter collusion.
"Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade" – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 7, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.