Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Numerical modeling and performance evaluation of passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier (PC-PRB)

Numerical modeling and performance evaluation of passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier... The passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier (PC-PRB) was proposed to address the limitations of traditional PRB configurations. To evaluate the hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of the PC-PRB system, we developed a simulation code named PRB-Trans. This code uses the two-dimensional (2D) finite element method to simulate groundwater flow and solute transport. Case studies demonstrate that PC-PRB technology is more efficient and cost-effective than continuous permeable reactive barrier (C-PRB) in treating the same contaminated plume. Implementation of PC-PRB technology results in a 33.3% and 72.7% reduction in PRB length (LPRB) and height (HPRB), respectively, while increasing 2D horizontal and 2D vertical pollutant treatment efficiencies of PRB by 87.8% and 266.8%, respectively. In addition, the PC-PRB technology has the ability to homogenize the pollutant concentration and pollutant flux through the PRB system, which can mitigate the problems arising from uneven distribution of pollutants in the C-PRB to some extent. The LPRB required for PC-PRB decreases as the water pipe length (Lp) increases, while the HPRB required initially decreases and then increases with increasing Lp. The effect of passive well height (Hw) on HPRB is not as significant as that of Lp on HPRB. Overall, PC-PRB presents a promising and advantageous PRB configuration in the effective treatment of various types of contaminated plumes.[graphic not available: see fulltext] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Springer Journals

Numerical modeling and performance evaluation of passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier (PC-PRB)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/numerical-modeling-and-performance-evaluation-of-passive-convergence-FCUB00zeIU
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © Higher Education Press 2023
ISSN
2095-2201
eISSN
2095-221X
DOI
10.1007/s11783-023-1731-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier (PC-PRB) was proposed to address the limitations of traditional PRB configurations. To evaluate the hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of the PC-PRB system, we developed a simulation code named PRB-Trans. This code uses the two-dimensional (2D) finite element method to simulate groundwater flow and solute transport. Case studies demonstrate that PC-PRB technology is more efficient and cost-effective than continuous permeable reactive barrier (C-PRB) in treating the same contaminated plume. Implementation of PC-PRB technology results in a 33.3% and 72.7% reduction in PRB length (LPRB) and height (HPRB), respectively, while increasing 2D horizontal and 2D vertical pollutant treatment efficiencies of PRB by 87.8% and 266.8%, respectively. In addition, the PC-PRB technology has the ability to homogenize the pollutant concentration and pollutant flux through the PRB system, which can mitigate the problems arising from uneven distribution of pollutants in the C-PRB to some extent. The LPRB required for PC-PRB decreases as the water pipe length (Lp) increases, while the HPRB required initially decreases and then increases with increasing Lp. The effect of passive well height (Hw) on HPRB is not as significant as that of Lp on HPRB. Overall, PC-PRB presents a promising and advantageous PRB configuration in the effective treatment of various types of contaminated plumes.[graphic not available: see fulltext]

Journal

Frontiers of Environmental Science & EngineeringSpringer Journals

Published: Nov 1, 2023

Keywords: Passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier; Numerical modeling; Hydraulic behavior assessment; Pollutant treatment performance evaluation; Influential factors analysis

References