Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

On Minds that Interpret Quantum Mechanics: a Tribute to Henry Stapp

On Minds that Interpret Quantum Mechanics: a Tribute to Henry Stapp This essay describes what an anthropologist has learned from his ethnographic research with physicists who are engaged in quantum physics interpretation, including Henry Stapp. I argue that meta-physical considerations about “mind” among physicists often obscure the possibility of empirical research on concrete and individual minds and the role they play in quantum interpretation. Therefore, the philosophical rigor of quantum interpretation could benefit if individual interpreters could find an interest in discovering a manner of analyzing their own style of interpretation such that their own style would be communicable with others as a topic of conversation, rather than simply repeated dogmatically and argumentatively. Such considerations would require greater empirical attention to human thought itself, such that “mind” becomes less abstract and mystified, and thus more knowable and self-conscious. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Activitas Nervosa Superior Springer Journals

On Minds that Interpret Quantum Mechanics: a Tribute to Henry Stapp

Activitas Nervosa Superior , Volume 62 (1) – Mar 29, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/on-minds-that-interpret-quantum-mechanics-a-tribute-to-henry-stapp-3cDmi2ZRfI
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © Neuroscientia 2019
Subject
Psychology; Cognitive Psychology; Neuropsychology; Psychology Research; Psychology, general; Experimental Psychology
ISSN
1802-9698
eISSN
1802-9698
DOI
10.1007/s41470-019-00064-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This essay describes what an anthropologist has learned from his ethnographic research with physicists who are engaged in quantum physics interpretation, including Henry Stapp. I argue that meta-physical considerations about “mind” among physicists often obscure the possibility of empirical research on concrete and individual minds and the role they play in quantum interpretation. Therefore, the philosophical rigor of quantum interpretation could benefit if individual interpreters could find an interest in discovering a manner of analyzing their own style of interpretation such that their own style would be communicable with others as a topic of conversation, rather than simply repeated dogmatically and argumentatively. Such considerations would require greater empirical attention to human thought itself, such that “mind” becomes less abstract and mystified, and thus more knowable and self-conscious.

Journal

Activitas Nervosa SuperiorSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 29, 2020

References