Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. B. Mckeithen, J.S. Reitman, H. R. Rueter, S.C. Hirtle (1981)
Knowledge Organization and Skill Differences in Computer ProgrammersCognitive Psychology, 13
W. L. Hays, R. L. Winkler (1971)
Statistics: Probability, Inference, and Decision
B. Monjardet (1985)
Concordance et consensus d'ordres totaux: Les coefficients K et WRevue de Statistique Appliquée, 33
H.R. Rueter (1985)
Identifying Memory Structure from Free Recall
D. E. Knuth (1968)
The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 1: Fundamental Algorithms
N. Dershowitz, S. Zaks (1980)
Enumeration of Ordered TreesDiscrete Mathematics, 31
J. S. Reitman, H. R. Rueter (1980)
Organization Revealed by Recall Orders and Confirmed by PausesCognitive Psychology, 12
M. G. Kendall (1955)
Rank Correlation Methods
S. C. Hirtle, J. Jonides (1985)
Evidence of Hierarchics in Cognitive MapsMemory and Cognition, 13
S. C. Hirtle (1982)
Lattice-based Similarity Measures Between Ordered TreesJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 25
K. S. Booth, G. S. Lueker (1976)
Testing for the Connective Ones Property, Interval Graphs, and Graph Planarity Using PQ-tree AlgorithmsJournal of Computer and System Sciences, 13
A. D. Gordon (1979)
A Measure of the Agreement Between RankingsBiometrika, 66
R. N. Shepard, P. Arabie (1979)
Additive Clustering: Representation of Similarities as Combinations of Discrete Overlapping PropertiesPsychological Review, 86
D. E. Broadbent, P. J. Cooper, M. H. P. Broadbent (1978)
A Comparison of Hierarchical and Matrix Retrieval Schemes in RecallJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4
J. P. Barthelemy, B. Leclerc, B. Monjardet (1986)
On the Use of Ordered Sets in Problems of Comparison and Consensus in ClassificationJournal of Classification, 3
G. Birkhoff (1967)
Lattice Theory
J.P. Cunningham (1980)
Trees as Memory Representations for Simple Visual PatternsMemory and Cognition, 8
Lattice theory is used to develop techniques for classifying groups of subjects on the basis of their recall strategies or multiple recall strategies within individual subjects. Using the ordered tree algorithm to represent sets of recall orders, it is shown how both trees and single recall strings can be represented as points within a nonsemimodular, graded lattice. Distances within the lattice structure are used to construct a dissimilarity measure,S, which can then be used to partition the individual recall strings. The measureS between strings is compared to Kendall's tau in three empirical tests, examining differences between individual subjects, differences between groups of subjects, and differences within a subject. It was shown that onlyS could recover the original differences. Differences between comparing chunks versus comparing orders are discussed.
Journal of Classification – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 18, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.