Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Garbade, W. Silber (1983)
Futures Contracts on Commodities with Multiple Varieties: An Analysis of Premiums and DiscountsThe Journal of Business, 56
nbspHARSHEET Chawla, N. Padmanabhan, N. Dhanuka (2019)
INDIAN AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY MARKET, 6
J. Hranaiova, R. Jarrow, W. Tomek (2005)
ESTIMATING THE VALUE OF DELIVERY OPTIONS IN FUTURES CONTRACTSJournal of Financial Research, 28
(2015)
Rajasthan stock limits order on Chana hits bull traders. Economic Times, available at https:// econo micti mes. india times. com/ marke ts/ commo dities/ rajas than
K. Garbade, W. Silber (1983)
Price Movements and Price Discovery in Futures and Cash MarketsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 65
C. Yaganti, B. Kamaiah (2012)
Hedging Efficiency of Commodity Futures Markets in India
PP Boyle (1977)
323Journal of Financial Economics, 4
Sanjay Mansabdar, Hussain Yaganti (2020)
Heterogeneity of Cash Markets at Physical Delivery Points and the Hedging Effectiveness of Agricultural Commodity Futures in India – Lessons for Contract Optimization., 9
A. Chatterjee, Siraj Hussain (2001)
Agricultural Commodity Futures: Searching for Potential Winners
S. Pirrong, Roger Kormendi, Philip Meguire (1994)
Multiple delivery points, pricing dynamics, and hedging effectiveness in futures markets for spatial commoditiesJournal of Futures Markets, 14
(2014)
Report of the Committee to suggest steps for fulfilling the objectives of price discovery and risk management of commodity derivatives market
Elizabeth Tashjian (1995)
Optimal futures contract designThe Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 35
DM Chance (1993)
127Journal of Futures Markets, 13
Shashikant Gupta, Himanshu Choudhary, D. Agarwal (2017)
Hedging Efficiency of Indian Commodity FuturesParadigm, 21
D. Chance, M. Hemler (1993)
The impact of delivery options on futures prices: A surveyJournal of Futures Markets, 13
S. Hegde, Sankarshan Basu, S. Parameswaran (2019)
Reallocating the Right to Choose the Delivery Grade in Futures MarketsTheoretical Economics Letters
Elizabeth Johnston, John Mcconnell (1989)
Requiem For A Market: An Analysis Of The Rise And Fall Of A Financial Futures ContractReview of Financial Studies, 2
P. Glasserman (2003)
Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering
P. Ouwehand (2006)
PRICING RAINBOW OPTIONS
Qianyan Ding, Li Ping (2009)
Pricing of Multi-Asset Options Using Monte Carlo Method2009 First International Conference on Information Science and Engineering
PP Boyle (1989)
101The Journal of Finance, 44
S Masood, TS Chary (2016)
Performance of commodity derivatives market in IndiaAmity Journal of Finance, 1
S Gupta, H Choudhary, DR Agarwal (2017)
Hedging efficiency of Indian commodity futures: An empirical analysisParadigm, 21
Dwight Sanders, M. Manfredo (2002)
The white shrimp futures market: Lessons in contract design and marketingAgribusiness, 18
Louis Ederington (1979)
The Hedging Performance of the New Futures MarketsJournal of Finance, 34
(2018)
Report of expert committee on the integration of commodity spot and derivative markets. Ministry of Finance, Government of India
Josué Martínez-Garmendia, James Anderson (1999)
Hedging performance of shrimp futures contracts with multiple deliverable gradesJournal of Futures Markets, 19
P. Boyle (1989)
The Quality Option and Timing Option in Futures ContractsJournal of Finance, 44
H. Johnson (1987)
Options on the Maximum or the Minimum of Several AssetsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22
P. Boyle (1977)
Options: A Monte Carlo approachJournal of Financial Economics, 4
Indian agricultural commodity futures have seen declining volumes over the last ten years. Several studies in the literature have suggested that this may be due to their hedging effectiveness being, in general, low. To prevent manipulation, location options are embedded into such commodity futures allow for the short position holder at expiration to deliver several non-par assets in addition to the par asset. Choices of delivery specifications pertaining to the location option can impact hedging effectiveness of the futures contract. We use a Monte Carlo approach to guide the choice of these delivery specifications including the number of deliverable assets, their inter-se correlations, discounts incurred for delivery of non-par assets and contract life, with the goal of optimizing hedging effectiveness of futures. We also corroborate the results of simulations with empirical evidence. The simulations, while confirming some of the empirical results in the literature also suggest several additional insights for the optimal selection of contract delivery specifications and provide contract designers with comprehensive guidelines for making choices of contract delivery specifications. These results also confirm the necessity for regulators and exchanges to focus on and constantly optimize delivery specifications of such futures contract to make them more useful for hedgers by improving their hedging effectiveness.
Asia-Pacific Financial Markets – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: Hedging effectiveness; Location options; Agricultural commodity futures; Monte carlo simulation; C63; G18; G23; Q02
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.