Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter provides a brief account of how academic discourse produced by disciplines like psychology has silenced and pathologised the experiences of African people reflecting the coloniality of the discipline and ongoing epistemic violence. The chapter unpacks the coloniality of the discipline in its knowledge production machinery through illustration of historic and contemporary examples of such violence. Discussions of power, politics, representation, ethics, and critical reflexivity are engaged as ways of countering the afterlives of colonisation as they manifest in the research endeavour. The chapter ends by offering some methodological approaches that might go towards articulating a Pan-African psychology. These include, participatory action research approaches; photovoice and storytelling; and narrative methodologies. Importantly, the chapter makes the argument that traditional modes of knowledge production have reproduced the erasure, silencing, and marginalisation, especially of African people. Reimagining different ways of doing research must, of necessity, be grounded in local knowledges and it must emerge from the experiences and concerns of those who have been excluded.]
Published: Jan 1, 2022
Keywords: Research methods; Knowledge production; Ethics; Critical reflexivity; Participatory research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.