Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
James Robinson, T. Verdier (2002)
The Political Economy of ClientelismERN: Other Macroeconomics: Employment
T Kanai (2003)
Manifesuto: Atarashii Seiji no Chouryuu [Manifesto: New Political Trend]
Mark Zupan (1990)
The last period problem in politics: Do congressional representatives not subject to a reelection constraint alter their voting behavior?Public Choice, 65
Vanessa Williamson, T. Skocpol, J. Coggin (2011)
The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican ConservatismPerspectives on Politics, 9
J Aldrich (1997)
Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America
Michael Boss (1974)
Economic theory of democracyPublic Choice, 19
(2003)
Manifesuto: Atarashii Seiji no Chouryuu [Manifesto: New Political Trend], Tokyo: Kobunsha
M. Osborne, Al Slivinski (1996)
A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-CandidatesQuarterly Journal of Economics, 111
C. Ferraz, Frederico Finan (2008)
Motivating politicians : the impacts of monetary incentives on quality and performance
Aurelia Mulgan (2002)
Japan's Failed Revolution: Koizumi and the Politics of Economic Reform
E Helpman (2008)
Party Discipline and Pork-Barrel Politics
R. Calvert (1985)
Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence*American Journal of Political Science, 29
J. Ferejohn (1986)
Incumbent performance and electoral controlPublic Choice, 50
A. Ishihara (2013)
“Strategic Candidacy via Endogenous Commitment”, mimeo
R. Reinikka, J. Svensson (2005)
Fighting Corruption to Improve Schooling: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign in UgandaJournal of the European Economic Association, 3
N. McCarty, K. Poole, H. Rosenthal (2001)
THE HUNT FOR PARTY DISCIPLINE IN CONGRESS #
P. Keefer (2007)
Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young DemocraciesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 51
D Figlio (2000)
Political Shirking, Opponent Quality, and Electoral SupportPublic Choice, 103
D. Wittman (1973)
Parties as Utility MaximizersAmerican Political Science Review, 67
T. Persson, G. Tabellini (2000)
Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy
Yasushi Asako (2014)
Campaign promises as an imperfect signal: How does an extreme candidate win against a moderate candidate?Journal of Theoretical Politics, 27
G. Grossman, E. Helpman (2004)
A Protectionist Bias in Majoritarian PoliticsCEPR Discussion Paper Series
T Palfrey E Aragones (2002)
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored CandidateJournal of Economic Theory, 103
D. Austen-Smith, J. Banks (1989)
Electoral accountability and incumbency
D Stokes (1963)
Spatial Models of Party CompetitionAmerican Political Science Review, 57
Y. Asako (2014)
“Campaign Promises as an Imperfect Signal: How Does an Extreme Candidate Win against a Moderate One?”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, forthcoming
J Snyder S Ansolabehere (2001)
Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election ModelsPublic Choice, 103
Steven Callander, Simon Wilkie (2007)
Lies, damned lies, and political campaignsGames Econ. Behav., 60
P. Ordeshook (1989)
Models of strategic choice in politics
Navin Kartik, R. McAfee (2006)
Signaling Character in Electoral CompetitionMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
James Campbell (2000)
The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote
G. Cox, Mathew McCubbins (1993)
Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House
D. Wittman (1983)
Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative TheoriesAmerican Political Science Review, 77
(2000)
Estimating Party Inuence in Congressional RoleCall Voting
Enriqueta Aragonès, T. Palfrey (2000)
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored CandidatePublic Choice & Political Economy eJournal
P. Keefer, Razvan Vlaicu (2004)
Democracy, Credibility and ClientelismLaw
(1996)
Polarization and Ine¢ cient Policies
Simeon Djankov, Caralee McLiesh, Tatiana Nenova, Andrei Shleifer (2001)
Who Owns the Media?*The Journal of Law and Economics, 46
Fiona McGillivray (1997)
Party Discipline as a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of
B Grofman (2005)
A Unified Theory of Party Competition
S Callander (2008)
Political MotivationsReview of Economic Studies, 75
(2013)
Strategic Candidacy via Endogenous Commitment
(2010)
Businessman Candidate
R. Barro (1973)
The control of politicians: An economic modelPublic Choice, 14
John Carey (1994)
Political shirking and the last term problem: Evidence for a party-administered pension systemPublic Choice, 81
Haifeng Huang (2010)
Electoral Competition When Some Candidates Lie and Others PanderJournal of Theoretical Politics, 22
David Figlio (1995)
The Effect of Retirement On Political Shirking: Evidence From Congressional VotingPublic Finance Review, 23
N. McCarty, K. Poole, H. Rosenthal (2001)
The Hunt for Party Discipline in CongressAmerican Political Science Review, 95
Ruy Teixeira (1996)
Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America.John H. Aldrich
T. Besley, Stephen Coate (1997)
An Economic Model of Representative DemocracyQuarterly Journal of Economics, 112
P McAfee N Kartik (2007)
Signaling Character in Electoral CompetitionThe American Economic Review, 97
J. Banks (1990)
A model of electoral competition with incomplete informationJournal of Economic Theory, 50
R. Melnick (2000)
Ending Welfare As We Know It
Junichiro Wada (1996)
The Japanese Election System: Three Analytical Perspectives
T Groseclose (2001)
A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence AdvantageAmerican Journal of Political Science, 45
Abstract This study examines and models the effects of partially binding campaign platforms in a political competition. Here, a candidate who implements a policy that differs from the platform must pay a cost of betrayal, which increases with the size of the discrepancy. I also analyse endogenous decisions by citizens to run for an election. In particular, the model is able to show two implications that previous frameworks have had difficulty with. First, candidates with different characteristics have different probabilities of winning an election. Second, even knowing that he/she will lose an election, a candidate will still run, hoping to make an opponent’s policy approach his/her own policy.
The Japanese Economic Review – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 2015
Keywords: economics, general; microeconomics; macroeconomics/monetary economics//financial economics; econometrics; development economics; economic history
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.