Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The previous two chapters were primarily concerned with justifying the demands of persons for autonomy as being ethically respectable in the interplay of personal autonomy and biographical identity. Now the question is whether arguments for a justification of paternalistic medical actions can be developed on the basis of the conception of biographical identity unfolded here. Thus the ethical line of attack of the previous two chapters will be reversed; at the same time, the general strategy of the previous chapters will be retained and the theme of medical paternalism limited to the question of the suitability of personal identity as a justifying principle in biomedical ethics. For this reason, in the following not all the aspects of paternalism can be taken up: only the area of medical action will be taken into consideration. Nor shall all justification strategies which have been developed in the almost unwieldy literature be discussed and subjected to critical examination in the course of this chapter. But rather, it will be shown that personality is a relevant aspect in the justification of paternalistic medical action.]
Published: May 25, 2017
Keywords: Medical Action; Advance Directive; Human Person; Personal Autonomy; Personal Integrity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.