Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[NAFTA not only introduced a disciplinary benchmark among state participants, but it also conveyed a ‘policy shock’ in the region; that is, once firms and market actors realized the complete phasing out of barriers to both trade and investment and the new market-oriented disciplines of the game, they had to adapt their production and market strategies accordingly. This chapter will explore some of the impacts entangled by this policy change conveyed by the disciplinary regime, mainly in terms of a further regionalization of trade and, to a lesser extent, investments, and in terms of the locational advantages of trans-border regions within North America.]
Published: Nov 24, 2015
Keywords: Foreign Direct Investment; Gross Domestic Product; Great Lake; America Average Growth Rate; Foreign Direct Investment Inflow
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.