Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Power Concentration in World PoliticsPrecipitants, Nonlinearities, and Structural Change

Power Concentration in World Politics: Precipitants, Nonlinearities, and Structural Change [“Streetcar’’ interpretations of world politics emphasize the significance of contingent catalysts vis-à-vis structural variables and multiple, nonlinear chains of causation, among other things. Ultimately, though, it is difficult to evaluate the significance of catalysts in the absence of systematic data on war precipitants that would allow one to compare the effects of catalysts and other factors. More concrete but under conceptualized is the explanatory payoff associated with examining nonlinear interactions among multiple rivalries in bringing about wars that spread more widely than anticipated. World War I is a good case in point. A very large number of interstate rivalries contributed in various ways and over a number of years to the outbreak of a world war that no one sought precisely in the way in which it emerged. Focusing on the structure of their interactions also facilitates the synthesis of a number of alternative interpretations of why World War I began. Examining the effects of interconnected and “ripe’’ rivalry fields in other major power war contexts should prove to be equally beneficial.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Power Concentration in World PoliticsPrecipitants, Nonlinearities, and Structural Change

Download PDF
26 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/power-concentration-in-world-politics-precipitants-nonlinearities-and-1w88C01Y32
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
ISBN
978-3-030-47421-8
Pages
179 –205
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-47422-5_8
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[“Streetcar’’ interpretations of world politics emphasize the significance of contingent catalysts vis-à-vis structural variables and multiple, nonlinear chains of causation, among other things. Ultimately, though, it is difficult to evaluate the significance of catalysts in the absence of systematic data on war precipitants that would allow one to compare the effects of catalysts and other factors. More concrete but under conceptualized is the explanatory payoff associated with examining nonlinear interactions among multiple rivalries in bringing about wars that spread more widely than anticipated. World War I is a good case in point. A very large number of interstate rivalries contributed in various ways and over a number of years to the outbreak of a world war that no one sought precisely in the way in which it emerged. Focusing on the structure of their interactions also facilitates the synthesis of a number of alternative interpretations of why World War I began. Examining the effects of interconnected and “ripe’’ rivalry fields in other major power war contexts should prove to be equally beneficial.]

Published: Jun 11, 2020

Keywords: World War I; Contingency; Structural change; Nonlinearity; Rivalry

There are no references for this article.