Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Philosophers do not have the term “pragmatism” to themselves. It has a characteristic and long-established usage in relation to political matters. Someone is “pragmatic” in political affairs when they are willing to forego what they might ideally want for the sake of achieving something superior to what they have. In being politically pragmatic one is prepared “to settle for half a loaf” by accepting an achievable improvement rather than insisting upon a maximally desirable outcome. Realizing that the best can become the enemy of the good the pragmatic politician accepts a realizable improvement at the piece of at the cost of forsaking a potentially unattainable ideality, accepting the duckling in hand rather than striving for the peacock in the offing.]
Published: May 25, 2016
Keywords: Philosophical Pragmatism; Pragmatic Dimension; Pragmatic Conception; Realistic Pragmatism; Italian Philosopher
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.