Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The majority of criminal cases are decided through plea bargaining and probability discounting (i.e., the change in the value of an outcome as it becomes less probable) may aid in the understanding of this process. University students were asked to complete a probability-discounting task involving three legal and two monetary outcomes. Groups were divided in terms of the race of the defendant and the participant’s sex. Results showed that the plea bargain in the case of murder was discounted more steeply than the other crime scenarios, that the predictions of the leading theory of plea bargaining (i.e., decision theory) were inaccurate, and that males and females discounted differently (only) when the recipient was African American (regardless of the type of outcome). The present results have theoretical and practical implications and should serve to highlight the utility of studying plea bargaining within a probability-discounting framework.
Behavior and Social Issues – Springer Journals
Published: May 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.