Report on Chinese Social Opinion and Crisis Management2013 Report on Online Public Opinion Incidents
Report on Chinese Social Opinion and Crisis Management: 2013 Report on Online Public Opinion...
Gao, Yunwei; Li, Mingzhe; Zheng, Guangjia; Liu, Cong; Liu, Rui; Wan, Xuan’ao; Qin, Jing
2019-05-23 00:00:00
[In the year 2013, the number of public opinion incidents with a greater “heat” or pressure profile has decreased compared to 2012. While the number of public opinion incidents pertaining to organizations and institutions has increased, the proportion of such incidents to the total has decreased. A large number of public opinion incidents were related to improper speech and behavior, public policies, and breaches of the law. Attention levels were the highest with regard to public opinion incidents pertaining to natural disasters. Among various municipalities, provinces, and autonomous regions, Beijing contributed the highest number of public opinion incidents. The time taken between the occurrence and the public exposure of a public opinion incident has become shorter. Response times on the Weibo services have become slightly shorter. New media outlets continue to be the exposure medium of choice, although the proportion of exposures via traditional media has risen slightly. Local governments are the key intervening actors, and tend to intervene more quickly. The 2012 Public Opinion Pressure Index was the highest for the period 2003–2013. Based on the distribution of public opinion pressure in the last 11 years, the index is comparatively higher in Beijing, Guangdong, Sichuan, and Henan.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/report-on-chinese-social-opinion-and-crisis-management-2013-report-on-8ejF6rGfjb
Report on Chinese Social Opinion and Crisis Management2013 Report on Online Public Opinion Incidents
[In the year 2013, the number of public opinion incidents with a greater “heat” or pressure profile has decreased compared to 2012. While the number of public opinion incidents pertaining to organizations and institutions has increased, the proportion of such incidents to the total has decreased. A large number of public opinion incidents were related to improper speech and behavior, public policies, and breaches of the law. Attention levels were the highest with regard to public opinion incidents pertaining to natural disasters. Among various municipalities, provinces, and autonomous regions, Beijing contributed the highest number of public opinion incidents. The time taken between the occurrence and the public exposure of a public opinion incident has become shorter. Response times on the Weibo services have become slightly shorter. New media outlets continue to be the exposure medium of choice, although the proportion of exposures via traditional media has risen slightly. Local governments are the key intervening actors, and tend to intervene more quickly. The 2012 Public Opinion Pressure Index was the highest for the period 2003–2013. Based on the distribution of public opinion pressure in the last 11 years, the index is comparatively higher in Beijing, Guangdong, Sichuan, and Henan.]
Published: May 23, 2019
Keywords: Online public opinion; New media; Intervention; Network governance; Public Opinion Pressure Index
Recommended Articles
Loading...
There are no references for this article.
Share the Full Text of this Article with up to 5 Colleagues for FREE
Sign up for your 14-Day Free Trial Now!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.