Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The fate of L. Petrażycki’s psychological theory of law and morality is quite dramatic. He was a scientist who developed a theory that was regarded as too subjective by those of his contemporaries who sought an appropriate foundation for legal phenomena. Afterwards, his psychological theory was interpreted in the context of the intuitivist currents in general philosophy, especially H. Bergson’s “philosophy of life” and E. Husserl’s phenomenology. This path was chosen by the most famous followers of L. Petrażycki, namely N. N. Alekseev and G. D. Gurvitch. However, from the contemporary perspective, Petrażycki’s psychological theory of law and morals should be interpreted differently, rather in light of the modern naturalistic understanding of consciousness and intentionality. An influential conception of this kind was proposed by the American philosopher J. Searle. Searle’s conception of the mental and the social provides arguments against the standard critique of Petrażycki’s ideas, focusing on the unacceptable psychologism and subjectivism of his approach.]
Published: Jan 8, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.