Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Bellah (2006)
The Robert Bellah Reader
(2021)
A Joyfully Serious Man
R. Bellah (1970)
Response to Comments on "Christianity and Symbolic Realism"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 9
R. Bellah (2011)
Religion in Human Evolution
R. Bellah (1970)
Christianity and Symbolic RealismJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 9
Matteo Bortolini (2019)
The return of the repressed on Robert N. Bellah, Norman O. Brown, and religion in human evolution.Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences
Benjamin Nelson (1970)
Is the Sociology of Religion Possible? A Reply to Robert BellahJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 9
R. Bellah, H. Joas (2012)
The Axial Age and Its Consequences
S. Klausner (1970)
Scientific and Humanistic Study of Religion: A Comment on "Christianity and Symbolic Realism"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 9
J. Burtchaell (1970)
A Response to "Christianity and Symbolic Realism"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 9
In Matteo Bortolini’s elegant and thoughtfully-written biographical account of Robert Bellah, we are given the opportunity to study an arc of development in U.S. sociological theory over the course of the 20th Century, in contact with several of sociology’s most influential shapers. This means that, to grapple with Bellah’s life, as presented by Bortolini, is to grapple with the ways that a broad range of social movements in American history, perhaps most powerfully the 1960’s “counter-culture,” have shaped contemporary American sociological theory and cultural life, particularly in the area of religion, but also in the area of politics. It is difficult, perhaps impossible, to remain neutral about such developments, and therefore about the character of Bellah himself, as Bortolini presents him. And yet Bortolini manages to achieve an admirable even-handedness in his treatment of Bellah, albeit through a rhetorical strategy that carries risks, as this essay illustrates. In this essay, I accept Bortolini’s welcome and important invitation to grapple with Robert Bellah’s life and legacy. Unlike Bortolini, I am unable to be even-handed, but I do strive to be fair. While I acknowledge the ways in which Bellah enriched sociological theories of culture, my overall assessment of Bellah’s legacy is very negative. In Robert Bellah’s religiously-tinged politicization of sociology, and in his relentlessly hostile attacks on political and religious positions with which he disagreed, I see prescriptions for the terribly intensified culture wars of today.
The American Sociologist – Springer Journals
Published: May 27, 2023
Keywords: Robert Bellah; Matteo Bortolini; Emile Durkheim; Talcott Parsons; Cultural sociology; Sociology of religion
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.