Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[By clarifying the separation of aretēaretē, Socrates tries to prove the significance of sophia and its position in relation to the other virtues. Platonic ironyirony is seen to be at work here, through which two goals are achieved: (a) the refutation of SocratesSocrates’ current interlocutor’s actions as the city’s leader, which are actions not founded on knowledge, but on ‘appearing’, as also becomes evident from the pretentious—and, finally, erroneous—appropriation of Socrates’ dialectic; and (b) the pre-announcement of thegood/beneficial (agathos, agathon): good politician-philosopher of the GorgiasGorgias and, later, the RepublicRepublic: the city leader must have a share in the greatest phronēsis, namely the knowledge (of the good) that stems from philosophical discussion.]
Published: Nov 29, 2018
Keywords: Separation of aretē; Good politician-philosopher
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.