Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Statistical Genetics of Quantitative TraitsInterval Mapping by Maximum Likelihood Approach

Statistical Genetics of Quantitative Traits: Interval Mapping by Maximum Likelihood Approach [As discussed in Chapter 10, interval mapping is powerful for the separation of QTL effects and QTL-marker linkage. Interval mapping based on a regression approach is computationally faster than a maximum likelihood (ML) approach, with comparable results between the two approaches in some particular cases. Kao (2000) discussed analytically and through simulation studies the conditions under which the regressionand ML-based approaches generate different results. Further comparisons by Mayer (2005) between the two approaches were made in terms of power, accuracy of position and effect estimates, and estimation of the residual variance when multiple linked QTLs are involved in the genetic control of a quantitative trait.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Statistical Genetics of Quantitative TraitsInterval Mapping by Maximum Likelihood Approach

Download PDF
31 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/statistical-genetics-of-quantitative-traits-interval-mapping-by-UB3pFHA879

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer New York
Copyright
© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007
ISBN
978-0-387-20334-8
Pages
237 –268
DOI
10.1007/978-0-387-68154-2_11
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[As discussed in Chapter 10, interval mapping is powerful for the separation of QTL effects and QTL-marker linkage. Interval mapping based on a regression approach is computationally faster than a maximum likelihood (ML) approach, with comparable results between the two approaches in some particular cases. Kao (2000) discussed analytically and through simulation studies the conditions under which the regressionand ML-based approaches generate different results. Further comparisons by Mayer (2005) between the two approaches were made in terms of power, accuracy of position and effect estimates, and estimation of the residual variance when multiple linked QTLs are involved in the genetic control of a quantitative trait.]

Published: Jan 1, 2007

Keywords: Mapping Population; Double Haploid; Interval Mapping; Marker Interval; Recombination Fraction

There are no references for this article.