Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chapter 3 1. REASON-BASED LOGIC AS AN EXTENSION OF PREDICATE LOGIC ‘Traditional’ logics such as propositional and predicate logic sketch a one- sided picture of what goes on in real life reasoning. Arguments of the form ‘modus ponens’ have a dominant place in this picture. Other forms of reasoning, such as arguments based on balancing reasons, can only with some ingenuity be modeled in these logics. Since such arguments play an important role both in the law and in practical reasoning in general, it is attractive to have a logic at one’s disposal that can deal with arguments based on the balancing of reasons for and against a conclusion. Reason- based Logic (RBL) is such a logic. One way to look at RBL is as a logic that is dedicated to practical (legal and moral) reasoning, with special attention to entities that function prominently in these types of reasoning, such as rules and principles. This is the way in which RBL was introduced in my Reasoning with Rules. Another way to look at it, which I want to emphasize here, is as an extension of predicate logic. First order predicate logic is included in RBL and RBL adds to
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Keywords: Predicate Logic; Abstract Reason; Public Prosecutor; Decisive Reason; Rule Application
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.