Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chapter 6 1. INTRODUCTION One of the central notions in legal theory and in legal logic is that of a norm. There are several kinds of entities that might be called norms. The following list contains some examples: − General norms, such as ‘Everybody with an income ought to submit a tax declaration’, or ‘It is forbidden to kill human beings’. − Specific norms such as ‘Margaret must pay Jane €100,-’. − Permissive norms such as ‘It is permitted to smoke in the canteen’. − Assignments of rights, such as ‘Everybody has the right to petition the government’. − Procedural rules, such as ‘A contract is made through offer and acceptance’. − Commands such as ‘Shut the door’. − Technical directives, e.g. in recipe’s such as ‘Take three spoons of sugar’. − Power conferring norms, such as ‘The mayor has the power to make emergency regulations’. − Descriptions of normative situations such as ‘In Belgium one ought to drive on the right hand side of the road’. Because of its central role, it would be desirable if the notion of a norm were clear. Regrettably, however, it is not. There circulate several theories about, and conceptions of norms. 160
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Keywords: Institutional Fact; Propositional Content; Definite Description; Correspondence Theory; Brute Fact
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.