Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Christopher W Tindale (2007)
10.1017/CBO9780511806544Fallacies and Argument Appraisal
Ladislav Koreň (2015)
ReasoningPractices of Reason
J. Mackenzie (1996)
Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary ReadingsInformal Logic, 18
J. Woods, D. Walton (1989)
Fallacies : Selected Papers 1972-1982
Brent Brossmann (2006)
Fallacies and Argument AppraisalArgumentation and Advocacy, 43
D. Hitchcock (2017)
Do the Fallacies Have a Place in the Teaching of Reasoning Skills or Critical Thinking
Porter Dl (1971)
The art of persuasion.Nursing mirror and midwives journal, 132 2
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
This paper’s thesis is that the fallacies should not be taught to undergraduates. Besides some bad influences, this is not only because doing so steals time more valuably spent elsewhere, but also because the field is now so complex (overlapping concepts, theories and disciplines), that we lack knowledgeable instructors and sophisticated students. The study of theories involving fallacies, however, remains viable.
Argumentation – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2023
Keywords: David Hitchcock; The fallacies; Michael Scriven; Teaching informal logic; Undergraduate education; Douglas Walton
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.