Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jun Nakabayashi (2013)
Small business set-asides in procurement auctions: An empirical analysisJournal of Public Economics, 100
J. Panzar, R. Willig (1977)
Free Entry and the Sustainability of Natural MonopolyThe Bell Journal of Economics, 8
J Goldhar, M Jelinek (1983)
Plan for economies of scopeHarv Bus Rev, 61
R. Pittman (2003)
Vertical Restructuring (or Not) of the Infrastructure Sectors of Transition EconomiesJournal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 3
J. Bröchner (1990)
Impacts of information technology on the structure of constructionConstruction Management and Economics, 8
CP Pires, M Catalão-Lopes (2013)
Economies of scope, entry deterrence and welfare. The B.EJ Econ Anal Policy, 13
E. Krasnokutskaya, Katja Seim (2011)
Bid Preference Programs and Participation in Highway Procurement AuctionsThe American Economic Review, 101
A. Gibb (2001)
Standardization and pre-assembly- distinguishing myth from reality using case study researchConstruction Management and Economics, 19
Carol Jewell, R. Flanagan, Weisheng Lu (2014)
The dilemma of scope and scale for construction professional service firmsConstruction Management and Economics, 32
AD Chandler (1990)
"scale and scope: the dynamics of industrial capitalism". The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
C. Pires, Margarida Catalão‐Lopes (2013)
Economies of Scope, Entry Deterrence and WelfareThe B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13
H. Hong (2002)
Increasing Competition and the Winner's Curse: Evidence from Procurement
A. Dubois, Lars-Erik Gadde (2000)
Supply strategy and network effects — purchasing behaviour in the construction industryEuropean Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6
Huseyin Leblebici (1991)
Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial CapitalismAcademy of Management Review, 16
Alon Eizenberg (2011)
Upstream Innovation and Product Variety in the U.S. Home PC MarketERN: Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics (Topic)
A Eizenberg (2014)
Upstream innovation and product variety in the U.S. home PC marketRev Econ Stud, 81
D. Gann (1996)
Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in JapanConstruction Management and Economics, 14
J. Panzar, R. Willig (1981)
Economies of scope
This paper explores the presence, causes, and effects of economies of scope in the construction industry. Based on public procurement data of the Hokkaido Regional Development Bureau from fiscal years 2006 to 2012, it is clear that the cost efficiency of bid and win rates are regressed by different factors, including the number of segments in public procurement in which a construction business operates. We found that the bid rates of diversified firms are higher than those of specialised firms. Therefore, the probability of a firm to win a bid decreases as their number of operational segments increases. Diseconomies of scope in the construction industry stem from the degree of specialisation of each segmentation, which is tested in this study by a regression analysis between the average bid rate of each business and the number of bids. The results show that costs are reduced for jobs that receive many bids, especially from firms participating in few segments.
"Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade" – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 2, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.