Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter conveys the conceptual and theoretical frameworks for the research. This includes intersecting literature on sustainability metrics (such as Ecological FootprintEcological footprint (EF) and biocapacityBiocapacity accounting), systemsSystems (theory) theorySystems (theory), and sustainability. The brief aims are centred around literature searches approached from a critical perspective to help inform the application and contribution of Ecological FootprintEcological footprint (EF) and biocapacityBiocapacity accounting as a sustainability metric. Therefore, in this chapter are criticisms directed at the National Footprint Accounts that are relevant to the Footprint CalculatorFootprint Calculator (Ecological Footprint Calculator). The focus here is on scaleScale (spatial/temporal), aggregationAggregation, and data qualityData quality, including consideration of quality scoresQualityscores.]
Published: Jan 28, 2021
Keywords: Sustainability; Natural/Social capital; Ecological Footprint and biocapacity accounting; National Footprint accounts; Footprint Calculator; Quality assurance; Quality scores; Criticisms; Issue themes; (Spatial) scale; Aggregation; Data quality
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.