Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Stephanie Lau (2008)
Information and bargaining in the hold‐up problemThe RAND Journal of Economics, 39
J. Laffont, J. Tirole (1993)
A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation
Faruk Gul (2001)
Unobservable Investment and the Hold‐Up ProblemEconometrica, 69
R. Sloof, H. Oosterbeek, Joep Sonnemans (2007)
Does Making Specific Investments Unobservable Boost Investment Incentives?Microeconomic Theory eJournal
K. Arrow (1962)
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Benjamin Hermalin, M. Katz (2009)
Information and the hold‐up problemThe RAND Journal of Economics, 40
D. Baron, David Besanko (1984)
Regulation and information in a continuing relationshipInformation Economics and Policy, 1
R Sloof, H Oosterbeek, J Sonnemans (2007)
Does making specific investments unobservable boost investment incentives?J Econ Manag Strateg, 16
D. Baron, R. Myerson (1982)
Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown CostsEconometrica, 50
Martin Loeb, W. Magat (1979)
A Decentralized Method for Utility RegulationThe Journal of Law and Economics, 22
Dezsoe Szalay (2005)
The Economics of Clear Advice and Extreme Options
M. Weitzman (1980)
The 'Ratchet Principle' and Performance IncentivesThe Bell Journal of Economics, 11
X. Freixas, R. Guesnerie, J. Tirole (1985)
Planning Under Incomplete Information and the Ratchet Effect.The Review of Economic Studies, 52
D. Sappington (1982)
Optimal Regulation of Research and Development under Imperfect InformationThe Bell Journal of Economics, 13
J. Tirole (1986)
Procurement and RenegotiationJournal of Political Economy, 94
This paper studies the joint effect of the regulator’s ex-ante awareness and ex-post ability to observe on the non-contractible investment activities of a natural monopoly with private marginal cost information. We show that the investment activities are lower when the regulator is ex-ante aware of their existence and ex-post able to observe them than when the regulator is never aware of, and never able to observe, them. This result, which points to the regulated firm’s prevention of ratcheting, is in line with an earlier finding of Tirole (J Polit Econ 94:235–259 1986) obtained in a bargaining model of procurement with two-sided asymmetric information. We also find that the producer welfare and the social surplus is always ex-ante higher when the regulator is unaware of its investment activities than when she is aware. Moreover, our computations show that depending on the specifications of our model, the unawareness of the regulator may positively affect the expected consumer and social welfares, as well.
"Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade" – Springer Journals
Published: May 4, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.