Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Uemura, M. Takao, Y. Otake, Makoto Iwasa, H. Hamada, W. Ando, Yoshinobu Sato, N. Sugano (2022)
The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT ImagesCalcified Tissue International, 111
S Lekamwasam (2003)
331J Clin Densitom, 6
J. Pierrepont, E. Marel, J. Baré, L. Walter, C. Stambouzou, M. Solomon, S. McMahon, A. Shimmin (2020)
Variation in femoral anteversion in patients requiring total hip replacementHIP International, 30
M Qutbi (2019)
86Arch Osteoporos, 14
G. Maldonado, M. Intriago, M. Larroudé, G. Aguilar, M. Moreno, José González, S. Vargas, C. Vera, Karla Rios, C. Rios (2020)
Common errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in imaging centers in EcuadorArchives of Osteoporosis, 15
S. Morgan, Ginnie Prater (2017)
Quality in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.Bone, 104
R. Jain, T. Vokes (2017)
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 20 3
E. Lewiecki, N. Binkley, Sarah Morgan, C. Shuhart, B. Camargos, John Carey, Catherine Gordon, L. Jankowski, J. Lee, William Leslie (2016)
Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 19 2
A. Feit, Natan Levin, Elizabeth McNamara, Partha Sinha, Latarsha Whittaker, A. Malabanan, H. Rosen (2019)
Effect of Positioning of the Region of Interest on Bone Density of the Hip.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
RK Jain (2017)
291J Clin Densitom, 20
K Uemura, Y Otake, M Takao (2021)
Automated segmentation of an intensity calibration phantom in clinical CT images using a convolutional neural networkInt J CARS, 16
K. Engelke, T. Lang, S. Khosla, L. Qin, P. Zysset, W. Leslie, J. Shepherd, J. Schousboe (2015)
Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) of the Hip in the Management of Osteoporosis in Adults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part I.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 18 3
Chen Wong, L. Gani, L. Chong (2020)
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry and pitfalls in the assessment of osteoporosis: a primer for the practicing clinicianArchives of Osteoporosis, 15
JA Kanis (2019)
3Osteoporos Int, 30
H. Shimosawa, T. Nagura, K. Harato, S. Kobayashi, M. Nakamura, M. Matsumoto, Y. Niki (2019)
Variation of three-dimensional femoral bowing and its relation to physical status and bone mineral density: a study with CTSurgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 41
S. Lekamwasam, R. Lenora (2003)
Effect of leg rotation on hip bone mineral density measurements.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 6 4
CP Wong (2020)
135Arch Osteoporos, 15
A. Faizan, J. Gerges, G. Asencio, J. Essig, E. Munini, W. Hozack (2016)
Changes in Femoral Version During Implantation of Anatomic Stems: Implications on Stem Design.The Journal of arthroplasty, 31 2
H. Abe, T. Sakai, M. Takao, T. Nishii, N. Nakamura, N. Sugano (2015)
Difference in Stem Alignment Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.The Journal of arthroplasty, 30 10
S Soen (2013)
247J Bone Miner Metab, 31
K. Uemura, Y. Otake, M. Takao, Hiroki Makino, M. Soufi, Makoto Iwasa, N. Sugano, Y. Sato (2022)
Development of an open-source measurement system to assess the areal bone mineral density of the proximal femur from clinical CT imagesArchives of Osteoporosis, 17
Y. Otake, M. Armand, R. Armiger, M. Kutzer, E. Basafa, P. Kazanzides, R. Taylor (2012)
Intraoperative Image-based Multiview 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Orthopaedic Surgery: Incorporation of Fiducial-Based C-Arm Tracking and GPU-AccelerationIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 31
JCH Goh (1995)
340Calcif Tissue Int, 57
J. Kanis, C. Cooper, R. Rizzoli, J. Reginster, on Foundation (2018)
European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal womenOsteoporosis International, 30
S. Soen, M. Fukunaga, T. Sugimoto, T. Sone, S. Fujiwara, N. Endo, I. Gorai, M. Shiraki, H. Hagino, T. Hosoi, H. Ohta, T. Yoneda, T. Tomomitsu, Japanese Osteoporosis (2013)
Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revisionJournal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 31
L. Rosenthall (2004)
Range of change of measured BMD in the femoral neck and total hip with rotation in womenJournal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 22
J. Goh, S. Low, K. Bose (1995)
Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometryCalcified Tissue International, 57
A. Karahan, B. Kaya, B. Kuran, O. Altindag, P. Yıldırım, S. Doğan, Aynur Başaran, Ender Salbaş, Turgay Altınbilek, T. Guler, S. Tolu, Z. Hasbek, B. Ordahan, Ercan Kaydok, Ufuk Yucel, S. Yeşilyurt, Almula Polat, Murat Çubukcu, O. Nas, U. Sarp, Ozan Yaşar, Seher Kuçuksaraç, G. Turkoglu, A. Karadağ, S. Bagcaci, K. Erol, Emel Guler, S. Tuna, A. Yıldırım, Savaş Karpuz (2016)
Common Mistakes in the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A Retrospective Descriptive Multicenter Study.Acta medica, 59 4
Junzhe Zhang, Kuo Zhao, Junyong Li, Yan-bin Zhu, Ying-Ze Zhang (2020)
Age-related dynamic deformation of the femoral shaft and associated osteoporotic factors: a retrospective study in Chinese adultsArchives of Osteoporosis, 15
B. Fan, Ying Lu, H. Genant, T. Fuerst, J. Shepherd (2009)
Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art DXA systems?Osteoporosis International, 21
Satoshi Kamihata, W. Ando, M. Takao, H. Hamada, K. Uemura, N. Sugano (2022)
Effect of Hip Flexion Contracture on the Pelvic Sagittal Tilt in the Supine Position: A Retrospective Case-Series Study.Modern rheumatology
Tetsuro Tani, W. Ando, H. Hamada, M. Takao, N. Sugano (2020)
Hip subluxation and osteophye morphology are related to coronal contracture of the hipJournal of Orthopaedic Research®, 39
M. Qutbi, Ali Salek, Mehdi Soltanshahi, Sadegh Ajdari, I. Asli (2019)
The impact of nonstandard hip rotation on densitometric results of hip regions and potential misclassification of diagnosisArchives of Osteoporosis, 14
D. Albano, P. Agnollitto, M. Petrini, Andrea Biacca, F. Ulivieri, L. Sconfienza, C. Messina (2020)
Operator-Related Errors and Pitfalls in Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: How to Recognize and Avoid Them.Academic radiology
D Albano (2021)
1272Acad Radiol, 28
SL Morgan (2017)
13Bone, 104
K. Uemura, Y. Otake, M. Takao, M. Soufi, Akihiro Kawasaki, N. Sugano, Yoshinobu Sato (2020)
Automated segmentation of an intensity calibration phantom in clinical CT images using a convolutional neural networkInternational Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 16
Jaclyn Watt, Keith Jackson, Jason Franz, Jay Dicharry, Jonathan Evans, D. Kerrigan (2011)
Effect of a Supervised Hip Flexor Stretching Program on Gait in Frail Elderly PatientsPM&R, 3
Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
SummaryThe patient’s position may affect the bone mineral density (BMD) measurements; however, the extent of this effect is undefined. This CT image-based simulation study quantified changes in BMD induced by hip flexion, adduction, and rotations to recommend appropriate patient positioning when acquiring dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry images.PurposeSeveral studies have analyzed the effect of hip rotation on the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, as the effects of hip flexion and abduction on BMD measurements remain uncertain, a computational simulation study using CT images was performed in this study.MethodsHip CT images of 120 patients (33 men and 87 women; mean age, 82.1 ± 9.4 years) were used for analysis. Digitally reconstructed radiographs of the proximal femur region were generated from CT images to calculate the BMD of the proximal femur region. BMD at the neutral position was quantified, and the percent changes in BMD when hip internal rotation was altered from −30° to 15°, when hip flexion was altered from 0° to 30°, and when hip abduction was altered from –15° to 30° were quantified. Analyses were automatically performed with a 1° increment in each direction using computer programming.ResultsThe alteration of hip angles in each direction affected BMD measurements, with the largest changes found for hip flexion (maximum change of 17.7% at 30° flexion) and the smallest changes found for hip rotation (maximum change of 2.2% at 15° internal rotation). The BMD measurements increased by 0.34% for each 1° of hip abduction, and the maximum change was 12.3% at 30° abduction.ConclusionThis simulation study quantified the amount of BMD change induced by altering the hip position. Based on these results, we recommend that patients be positioned carefully when acquiring DXA images.
Archives of Osteoporosis – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 24, 2023
Keywords: DRR; Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; Image acquisition; Osteoporosis; Quantitative CT
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.