Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Emperor’s new clothes? Perceptions of the EU’s strategic partnerships in Asia

The Emperor’s new clothes? Perceptions of the EU’s strategic partnerships in Asia In order to adapt to a changing global order, the European Union (EU) has established an important mechanism for cooperating with some of the world’s most influential countries—strategic partnerships (Renard 2012). Four of these partners are Asian—China, India, Japan and South Korea. As a mechanism for understanding the importance of the EU’s strategic partnership agreements in Asia as well as the EU’s potential influence in these countries, this paper examines and compares how the EU’s four strategic partners in Asia view the Union. It identifies similarities and differences in their perceptions of, and attitudes towards, the EU. The paper draws on a methodologically robust data analysis examining three fields of interest in these four countries over 10 years: (1) the filters through which the EU is reported on and understood by the news media in the respective countries; (2) how the EU is perceived by the general public; (3) how the EU is perceived and understood by the national elites in its four strategic partners in Asia. The article demonstrates some similarities and differences across the four strategic partnerships. Firstly, and positively for the EU, the EU’s strategic partnerships in the four Asian countries are viewed as being more than just about a trading relationship for the countries involved. Secondly, these partnerships have been regarded as comprehensive. Thirdly, there was also a noticeable image of an increasingly inwardly occupied EU from 2006 to 2015, hence potentially diminishing the perceived global actorness of the Union. Fourthly, the studied Asian countries considered the EU one of their important partners but ranked it behind the USA and their neighbouring countries. Finally, positive impressions of the EU were also found to have weakened considerably in the past decade. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Asia Europe Journal Springer Journals

The Emperor’s new clothes? Perceptions of the EU’s strategic partnerships in Asia

Lai, Suetyi; Holland, Martin; Kelly, Serena
Asia Europe Journal , Volume 17 (3) – Jul 4, 2019
Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/the-emperor-s-new-clothes-perceptions-of-the-eu-s-strategic-oBI0ZaLhKS
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general; International Economics
ISSN
1610-2932
eISSN
1612-1031
DOI
10.1007/s10308-019-00558-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In order to adapt to a changing global order, the European Union (EU) has established an important mechanism for cooperating with some of the world’s most influential countries—strategic partnerships (Renard 2012). Four of these partners are Asian—China, India, Japan and South Korea. As a mechanism for understanding the importance of the EU’s strategic partnership agreements in Asia as well as the EU’s potential influence in these countries, this paper examines and compares how the EU’s four strategic partners in Asia view the Union. It identifies similarities and differences in their perceptions of, and attitudes towards, the EU. The paper draws on a methodologically robust data analysis examining three fields of interest in these four countries over 10 years: (1) the filters through which the EU is reported on and understood by the news media in the respective countries; (2) how the EU is perceived by the general public; (3) how the EU is perceived and understood by the national elites in its four strategic partners in Asia. The article demonstrates some similarities and differences across the four strategic partnerships. Firstly, and positively for the EU, the EU’s strategic partnerships in the four Asian countries are viewed as being more than just about a trading relationship for the countries involved. Secondly, these partnerships have been regarded as comprehensive. Thirdly, there was also a noticeable image of an increasingly inwardly occupied EU from 2006 to 2015, hence potentially diminishing the perceived global actorness of the Union. Fourthly, the studied Asian countries considered the EU one of their important partners but ranked it behind the USA and their neighbouring countries. Finally, positive impressions of the EU were also found to have weakened considerably in the past decade.

Journal

Asia Europe Journal – Springer Journals

Published: Jul 4, 2019

References

  • The EU and Asia within an evolving global order: what is Europe? Where is Asia?
    Breslin, S
  • What role for the European Union in Asia? An analysis of the EU’s Asia strategy and the growing significance of EU-China relations
    Casarini, N
  • European Union - Asia-Pacific trade relations: tentative bilateralism amidst competing plurilateral initiatives
    las Heras, BP
  • Europe-Asia interregional relations: a decade of ASEM
    Gaens, B
  • Role of the European Union in Asia, the: China and India as strategic partners
  • EU- East Asia relations: effects of the global financial and Eurozone debt crises
    Pacheco Pardo, R
  • The EU in Asia: facts and figures concerning the EU’s engagement in the Asia-Pacific
    Reiterer, M
  • The European Union’s Asia strategies: problems of foreign policy and international relations
    Smith, M; Vichitsorasatrab, N
  • China, Japan and the European community
    Taylor, R
  • Shaping factors of EU–East Asia relations
    Geest, W
  • The EU and China in the context of inter-regionalism
    Vichitsoratsatra, N
  • Far, yet close enough?: dynamics of the EU representations in East Asian media
    Yoon, SW; Lai, SY