Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The moral philosophy of medicine may be based on: prima facie principles (nonmaleficence, beneficence, autonomy, and justice) and subsidiary principles (truth-telling, promise-keeping, confidentiality), virtues (fidelity, compassion, practical wisdom, justice, fortitude, temperance, integrity, self-effacement) or on the principle of utility (welfare maximization). In this chapter I claim that the purely rationalistic philosophy of medicine based on either duties or principles (including the principle of maximizing utility function) presents an incomplete picture of moral life which is not sufficient to cover the complexity of medical ethics, in particular the ethics of reproduction. I argue that the neo-Aristotelian virtue approach to ethics could significantly enhance the understanding of medical ethics and its application in the clinical context. Therefore, I consider the possibility of a view combining duties with virtues in a unified moral scheme.]
Published: Apr 25, 2018
Keywords: Virtue ethics; Kantian ethics; Utilitarianism; Genetic testing; Medical ethics; Reproduction; Genetic counseling; Principlism; Genetic selection
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.