Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/the-fallacy-fallacy-from-the-owl-of-minerva-to-the-lark-of-arete-stV6acyexR
References (48)
-
Quassim Cassam (2021)
Misunderstanding vaccine hesitancy: A case study in epistemic injusticeEducational Philosophy and Theory, 55
-
Scholarship at UWindsor Scholarship at UWindsor Virtue Argumentation and Bias Virtue Argumentation and Bias -
Andrew Aberdein (2014)
In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument AppraisalInformal Logic, 34
-
R. Talisse, S. Aikin (2021)
Disagreement, polarization, and the flight of Minerva’s Owl. A reply to VaidyaArgument: Biannual Philosophical Journal
-
S. Aikin, R. Talisse (2018)
The Owl of Minerva ProblemSouthwest Philosophy Review
-
Tempest Henning (2021)
“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness NormsInformal Logic
-
Katharina Stevens, Daniel Cohen (2020)
Angelic Devil’s Advocates and the Forms of AdversarialityTopoi, 40
-
W. Parks (1986)
Flyting, Sounding, Debate: Three Verbal Contest GenresPoetics Today, 7
-
Andrew Aberdein (2016)
413Topoi, 35
-
Andrew Aberdein (2020)
Intellectual humility and argumentationThe Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Humility
-
B. Hedden (2018)
Hindsight bias is not a biasAnalysis
-
S. Iyengar, S. Westwood (2015)
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group PolarizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 59
-
Gilbert Harman (1999)
XIV—Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error, 99
-
Douglas Walton (1998)
Ad Hominem Arguments -
D. Walton, E. Krabbe (1995)
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning -
Andrew Aberdein (2014)
77Informal Logic, 34
-
Alfred Archer (2018)
The problem with moralismRatio, 31
-
I. Kidd (2016)
Charging Others with Epistemic ViceThe Monist, 99
-
Jens Lemanski (2022)
Discourse Ethics and Eristic -
Justin Tosi, Brandon Warmke (2020)
Grandstanding: The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk -
Andrew Aberdein (2009)
Virtue in ArgumentArgumentation, 24
-
J. Rowan (1997)
Consciousness and ExperienceSelf and society, 25
-
S. N, T. Damer, Emory College (1980)
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments -
J. Whyte (2011)
From Crimes Against Logic -
Daniel Cohen (2015)
Missed Opportunities in Argument Evaluation -
J. Gascón (2018)
Virtuous Arguers: Responsible and ReliableArgumentation, 32
-
Andrew Aberdein (2010)
165Argumentation, 24
-
Andrew Aberdein (2016)
The Vices of ArgumentTopoi, 35
-
A. Schopenhauer, T. Saunders (2011)
The Art of Controversy: And Other Posthumous Papers -
Johnny Woods (2008)
Lightening up on the Ad HominemInformal Logic, 27
-
Hrishikesh Joshi (2020)
What are the chances you’re right about everything? An epistemic challenge for modern partisanshipPolitics, Philosophy & Economics, 19
-
D. Godden (2021)
Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva ProblemArgumentation, 36
-
Andrew Aberdein (2021)
Was Aristotle a Virtue Argumentation Theorist?Argumentation Library
-
J. Pollock (1986)
Contemporary theories of knowledge -
Andrew Aberdein, Patrick Bondy, Laura Benacquista (2016)
Virtue argumentation and biasArgumentation, objectivity and bias: Proceedings of the 11th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21, 2016
-
Richard Davies (2015)
Eristic dialectic: the fencing master's judgment, 1
-
Andrew Aberdein (2016)
Arguments with losers -
Andrew Aberdein (2016)
1Florida Philosophical Review, 16
-
The Fallacy Fallacy: From the Owl of Minerva to the Lark of Arete -
Christian Cotton (2018)
Argument from FallacyBad Arguments
-
I. Kidd, H. Battaly, Quassim Cassam (2020)
Vice Epistemology -
Leon Goldstein (1972)
Historians' fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thoughtPhilosophia, 2
-
J. Webber (2006)
Virtue, Character and SituationJournal of Moral Philosophy, 3
-
Andrew Aberdein, Joseph Bjelde, David Merry, Christopher Roser (2021)
Was Aristotle a virtue argumentation theorist?Essays on argumentation in antiquity
-
(2016)
Proleptic reasons -
L. Ross (1977)
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10
-
J. Miller, Cherie Miller (2015)
Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense: A Practical Text For Critical and Creative Thinking -
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
- ISSN
- 0920-427X
- eISSN
- 1572-8374
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10503-023-09595-9
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The fallacy fallacy is either the misdiagnosis of fallacy or the supposition that the conclusion of a fallacy must be a falsehood. This paper explores the relevance of these and related errors of reasoning for the appraisal of arguments, especially within virtue theories of argumentation. In particular, the fallacy fallacy exemplifies the Owl of Minerva problem, whereby tools devised to understand a norm make possible new ways of violating the norm. Fallacies are such tools and so are vices. Hence a similar problem arises with argumentative vices. Fortunately, both instances of the problem have a common remedy.
Journal
Argumentation – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2023
Keywords: Scott Aikin; Fallacist’s fallacy; Fallacy fallacy; David Hackett Fischer; David Godden; Owl of Minerva problem; Vices of argument; Virtues of argument