Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1991)
America’s Green Strategy
D. Popp (2004)
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INTERNATIONAL INNOVATION AND DIFFUSION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES: THE EFFECTS OF NOX AND SO2 REGULATION IN THE U.S., JAPAN, AND GERMANY
(2017)
Digging deeper into corruption, violence against journalists and active civil society
Sonia Kheder, Natalia Zugravu (2012)
Environmental Regulation and French Firms Location Abroad: An Economic Geography Model in an International Comparative StudyEcological Economics, 77
Sarah Stafford (2000)
The Impact of Environmental Regulations on the Location of Firms in the Hazardous Waste Management IndustryLand Economics, 76
(1991)
Increasing returns and economic geography
Grazia Cecere, Nicoletta Corrocher (2016)
Stringency of regulation and innovation in waste management: an empirical analysis on EU countriesIndustry and Innovation, 23
C. Rammer, Sascha Rexhauser (2011)
Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis: Environmental Innovations and Firm-ProfitabilityERN: Innovation (Topic)
Lorena D'Agostino (2015)
How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesisEconomia Politica, 32
H. Jeswani, A. Azapagic (2016)
Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.Waste management, 50
J. Martínez-Alier (1995)
The Environment as a Luxury Good or “Too Poor to be Green” ?Économie appliquée
Pekka Harju-Autti, Eevi Kokkinen (2014)
A Novel Environmental Awareness Index Measured Cross-Nationally For Fifty Seven Countries
(2000)
The location of European industry, economic papers no. 142. European Commission. D-G for Economic and Financial Affairs
Abay Mulatu, R. Gerlagh, D. Rigby, A. Wossink (2010)
Environmental Regulation and Industry Location in EuropeEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 45
P. Lanoie, J. Laurent-Lucchetti, N. Johnstone, Stefan Ambec (2011)
Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter HypothesisNonprofit Organizations eJournal
A. Rabl, J. Spadaro, A. Zoughaib (2008)
Environmental impacts and costs of solid waste: a comparison of landfill and incinerationWaste Management & Research, 26
B. Copeland, M. Taylor (1994)
North-South Trade and the EnvironmentQuarterly Journal of Economics, 109
(2000)
Beyond the bin: The economics of waste management options. A final report to Friends of the Earth
M. Cole (2004)
Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkagesEcological Economics, 48
A. Rose, M. Spiegel (2010)
The Gravity Model in International Trade: International environmental arrangements and international commerce
B. Javorcik, S. Wei (1999)
Pollution Havens and Foreign Direct Investment: Dirty Secret or Popular Myth?Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3
H. Siebert (1977)
Environmental quality and the gains from tradeOpen Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy
D. Kellenberg, A. Levinson (2013)
Waste of Effort? International Environmental AgreementsJournal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1
T. Panayotou (2000)
Economic Growth and the Environment
(1991)
Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement
J. Long, Laurie Ervin (2000)
Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression ModelThe American Statistician, 54
M. Cole, E. Neumayer (2005)
Kuznets curve: can developing countries escape the detrimental consequences of economic growth?
M. Steven (1990)
The environment as a factor of production
J. Tobey (1990)
The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical TestKyklos, 43
Ryan Kellogg (2006)
The Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Significance and Insignificance
Smita Brunnermeier, M. Cohen (2003)
Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industriesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45
(1976)
Waste treatment facilities — your guide to waste disposal
M. McGuire (1982)
Regulation, factor rewards, and international tradeJournal of Public Economics, 17
M. Rauscher (1999)
International Trade in Hazardous WasteThuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory
R. Pethig (1976)
Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of Comparative AdvantageJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2
G. Eskeland, A. Harrison (1997)
Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven HypothesisNBER Working Paper Series
Incinerator Ash (2015)
RECOVERY OF METALS FROM WASTE INCINERATOR BOTTOM ASH
(2004)
Lecture on landfill operation and construction
Stefan Ambec, M. Cohen, Stewart Elgie, P. Lanoie (2010)
The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7
J. Hausman, C. Palmer (2011)
Heteroskedasticity-Robust Inference in Finite SamplesNBER Working Paper Series
B. Gemmill, Abimbola Bamidele-Izu (2002)
The Role of NGOs and Civil Society in Global Environmental Governance
(2017)
Landfill mining overview
M. Keppert, Z. Pavlík, V. Tydlitát, Petra Volfová, S. Švarcová, M. Šyc, R. Černý (2012)
Properties of municipal solid waste incineration ashes with respect to their separation temperatureWaste Management & Research, 30
P. Beukering (2001)
Recycling, International Trade and the Environment: An Empirical Analysis
E. Durmuşoğlu (2004)
Evaluation of Waste Thickness Effects on Landfills
J. Albers (2014)
Responsibility and Liability in the Context of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes by Sea: Existing Rules and the 1999 Liability Protocol to the Basel Convention
Claire Brunel, A. Levinson (2013)
Measuring Environmental Regulatory Stringency
Thomas Brambor, W. Clark, Matt Golder (2006)
Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical AnalysesPolitical Analysis, 14
(2005)
Delivering key waste management infrastructure : Lessons learned from Europe
B. Copeland, M. Taylor (2003)
Trade, Growth and the EnvironmentNBER Working Paper Series
D. Kellenberg (2010)
Consumer Waste, Backhauling, and Pollution HavensJournal of Applied Economics, 13
This research investigates the influence environmental policy stringency has, together with other factors, such as land and capital endowments, on the location patterns of the European waste management industry. The pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) and the Porter hypothesis (PH) are tested simultaneously through the employment of a model that includes interactions between country characteristics and waste treatment option intensities. Analysis of 27 countries and 3 treatment options reveals that stringent regulations increase a country’s share in the recovery sector, supporting the PH. Despite the opposite effect being observed in the final disposal sector, the evidence is not strong enough to confirm the PHH in its original form. The general negative relationship between the pollution intensity and the regulatory stringency, however, indicates the presence of a pollution haven effect.
"Economia Politica" – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 4, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.