Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Coram, Alma Glavovic, Juliana Ng, D. Woodliff (2008)
The Moral Intensity of Reduced Audit Quality ActsEar and Hearing, 27
(2010)
Audit Supervisors ' Response to Audit Staff False Sign-off: Insights from Retributive Justice
(1990)
The impact of time budget pressure, personality, and leadership variables on dysfunctional auditor behavior
Bernard Pierce, Breda Sweeney (2004)
Cost–quality conflict in audit firms: an empirical investigationEuropean Accounting Review, 13
David Donnelly, J. Quirin, D. O'Bryan (2003)
Auditor Acceptance of Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: An Explanatory Model Using Auditors' Personal CharacteristicsBehavioral Research in Accounting, 15
C. Malone, R. Roberts (1998)
Factors Associated with the Incidence of Reduced Audit Quality Behaviors
B Sweeney, D Arnold, B Pierce (2010)
The impact of perceived ethical culture of the firm and demographic variables on auditors’ ethical evaluation and intention to act decisionsJournal of Business Ethics, 93
Bernard Pierce, Breda Sweeney (2006)
Perceived Adverse Consequences of Quality Threatening Behaviour in Audit FirmsWiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Auditing
Philip Reckers, S. Wheeler, Bernard Wong-On-Wing (1997)
A comparative examination of auditor premature sign-offs using the direct and the randomized response methodsAuditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 16
(1987)
The effect of audit billing arrangement on underreporting of time and audit quality reduction acts
(1992)
The perceived effects of fi xed fee audit billing arrangements
(1986)
Quality control, false signoff, and underreporting of time: Some empirical fi ndings
(1982)
Audi - tors ’ perceptions of time budget pressures and false signoffs : A replication and extension
Breda Sweeney, Don Arnold, Bernard Pierce (2010)
The Impact of Perceived Ethical Culture of the Firm and Demographic Variables on Auditors’ Ethical Evaluation and Intention to Act DecisionsJournal of Business Ethics, 93
P. Coram, Juliana Ng, D. Woodliff (2003)
A Survey of Time Budget Pressure and Reduced Audit Quality Among Australian AuditorsAustralian Accounting Review, 13
B Sweeney, B Pierce (2004)
Management control in audit firms: A qualitative examinationAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17
C. McNair (1991)
Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior☆Accounting Organizations and Society, 16
Breda Sweeney, Bernard Pierce (2004)
Management control in audit firmsAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17
(1995)
An examination of auditors ’ reporting intentions upon discovery of procedures falsely signedoff
(1996)
The operation of control systems in large audit fi rms
Bernard Pierce, Breda Sweeney (2005)
Management control in audit firms¿Partners¿ perspectivesManagement Accounting Research, 16
P. Coram, Juliana Ng, D. Woodliff (2004)
The Effect of Risk of Misstatement on the Propensity to Commit Reduced Audit Quality Acts under Time Budget PressureEar and Hearing, 23
Mike Shapeero, H. Koh, Larry Killough (2003)
Underreporting and premature sign‐off in public accountingManagerial Auditing Journal, 18
(1991)
False sign-off of audit procedures: An analysis
D. Otley, Bernard Pierce (1995)
The control problem in public accounting firms: An empirical study of the impact of leadership styleAccounting Organizations and Society, 20
C. Willett, M. Page (1996)
A SURVEY OF TIME BUDGET PRESSURE AND IRREGULAR AUDITING PRACTICES AMONG NEWLY QUALIFIED UK CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTSBritish Accounting Review, 28
Financial statement audit quality is directly threatened when auditors sign off audit steps without performing the required work. This behavior, known as false sign-off, has received attention in the academic literature for over 30 years. Most prior false sign-off research has focused on trying to understand why and how much false sign-off occurs from the perspective of the auditors who engage in the behavior. Some recent research based on experiments and semi-structured interviews has investigated the organizational response to the discovery of false sign-off, finding that one reason the behavior may occur is that it is not sufficiently discouraged when it is discovered. The current study uses a widely distributed survey to ask auditors about their discovery of and response to actual instances of false sign-off. The survey explores the types and frequency of discovered false sign-off, the actions actually taken by auditors when it is discovered, the factors that influenced the auditors’ chosen course of action and the ultimate organizational response to the cases that are reported.
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 2, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.