Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The chapter tries to show that Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law contains in fact two theories, one internal and the other external. The internal one is based on conceptual analysis. In this regard, Shapiro claims that law can be best understood as a social plan to solve the moral problems of the community in certain circumstances. The logic of social planning makes law intelligible from the participant’s perspective. The external one is a kind of functional explanation, and the internal point of view plays no role under this approach. The idea is to identify what social needs law satisfies for the community that holds a legal system. The conclusion of the chapter is that even if one is not persuaded by Shapiro’s arguments against the previous positivist theories like Hart’s, there are good theoretical reasons to value the Planning Theory of Law: it provides a mixed understanding of legal practices; it captures at the same time two aspects of the social reality. On the one hand, it presents a view of law that accommodates most of the fundamental characteristics of legal systems. On the other hand, it offers a functional analysis of law that illuminates the valuable services law provides for us.]
Published: Jul 11, 2012
Keywords: Legal System; Corrective Justice; Master Plan; Internal Point; Moral Problem
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.