The Politics of Wellbeing Reconciling Universal Frameworks and Local Realities in Understanding and Measuring Wellbeing
The Politics of Wellbeing : Reconciling Universal Frameworks and Local Realities in Understanding...
McGregor, J. Allister
2018-07-05 00:00:00
[Many recent initiatives to measure human wellbeing at national and international levels draw on universalist frameworks that propose what human wellbeing consists of. There is also an important counter tendency in this global movement that sees human wellbeing thinking as a place to explore and express differences in cultural and social identities. There is a need for greater clarity about how we might reconcile universalist and localist approaches to wellbeing and this chapter argues that this may be achieved by distinguishing the different public policy and governance purposes that wellbeing measurement initiatives seek to address. The conclusion discusses the dangers of imposing particular universalist conceptions and assuming away critical differences between competing conceptions of wellbeing and methodologies for assessing it.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/the-politics-of-wellbeing-reconciling-universal-frameworks-and-local-0tNc3jQPy2
The Politics of Wellbeing Reconciling Universal Frameworks and Local Realities in Understanding and Measuring Wellbeing
[Many recent initiatives to measure human wellbeing at national and international levels draw on universalist frameworks that propose what human wellbeing consists of. There is also an important counter tendency in this global movement that sees human wellbeing thinking as a place to explore and express differences in cultural and social identities. There is a need for greater clarity about how we might reconcile universalist and localist approaches to wellbeing and this chapter argues that this may be achieved by distinguishing the different public policy and governance purposes that wellbeing measurement initiatives seek to address. The conclusion discusses the dangers of imposing particular universalist conceptions and assuming away critical differences between competing conceptions of wellbeing and methodologies for assessing it.]
Published: Jul 5, 2018
Keywords: Buen Vivir; Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS); Public policyPublic Policy; Well-being Data; OECD Framework
Recommended Articles
Loading...
There are no references for this article.
Share the Full Text of this Article with up to 5 Colleagues for FREE
Sign up for your 14-Day Free Trial Now!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.