Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter examines the relationship between well-being and social justiceJusticesocial. It addresses the question, ‘Equality of What’? After considering resources, opportunities and preference satisfaction as answers to this question, this chapter proposes that well-being is the appropriate ‘currency of justice’. However, ‘well-being’ is a contested concept. Empirical data relating to the 2007–2010 economic crisis highlight the shortcomings of subjective well-being (happiness and satisfaction) as a reliable source of information for socially just public policyPublic policy. In contrast, the Capabilities ApproachCapabilities/ capabilities approach/ capabilities theory to well-being brings together the most important aspects of resources, opportunities, and subjective states. This chapter concludes that equality of well-being, defined in terms of capabilities, provides the strongest, most defensible account of egalitarian social justiceJusticesocial, and the foundations of a just society.]
Published: Jul 5, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.