Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The use of qualitative research to better understand public opinions on climate change

The use of qualitative research to better understand public opinions on climate change The science and practice of climate change communication have significantly evolved over the last two decades, leading to a subfield of environmental communication focused on perception, awareness, and risk associated with climate change. This body of literature has demonstrated the importance of recognizing the differences among individuals and social groups in terms of cultural, psychological, and political reasons for their perceptions regarding climate change and has provided guidance for communicating with target audiences. However, most of the research in this subfield has relied on quantitative data from nationally representative survey instruments. While such metrics are essential to understanding longitudinal trends in public perceptions, they are limited in providing deeper understanding of how an individual perceives climate change in relation to other environmental and social issues. Qualitative data, elicited through techniques such as focus groups and semi-structured interviews, can help to provide these insights. In addition, qualitative research can support a more relational approach to climate change communication, which emphasizes the importance of seeing science communication as an opportunity to connect, rather than to persuade. In this paper, we present findings from semi-structured interviews (“environmental conversations”) with fifteen individuals based in the United States regarding their opinions, knowledge, and perceptions of climate change and other environmental issues. The findings demonstrate nuance and diversity in people’s opinions on climate change and how they are connected to other priorities and values. We recommend the value of qualitative research as a tool not only to better understand different environmental perspectives, but additionally to support two-way science communication among the broader public. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Springer Journals

The use of qualitative research to better understand public opinions on climate change

Download PDF
9 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/the-use-of-qualitative-research-to-better-understand-public-opinions-R6N36S7N5g
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © AESS 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
ISSN
2190-6483
eISSN
2190-6491
DOI
10.1007/s13412-023-00841-w
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The science and practice of climate change communication have significantly evolved over the last two decades, leading to a subfield of environmental communication focused on perception, awareness, and risk associated with climate change. This body of literature has demonstrated the importance of recognizing the differences among individuals and social groups in terms of cultural, psychological, and political reasons for their perceptions regarding climate change and has provided guidance for communicating with target audiences. However, most of the research in this subfield has relied on quantitative data from nationally representative survey instruments. While such metrics are essential to understanding longitudinal trends in public perceptions, they are limited in providing deeper understanding of how an individual perceives climate change in relation to other environmental and social issues. Qualitative data, elicited through techniques such as focus groups and semi-structured interviews, can help to provide these insights. In addition, qualitative research can support a more relational approach to climate change communication, which emphasizes the importance of seeing science communication as an opportunity to connect, rather than to persuade. In this paper, we present findings from semi-structured interviews (“environmental conversations”) with fifteen individuals based in the United States regarding their opinions, knowledge, and perceptions of climate change and other environmental issues. The findings demonstrate nuance and diversity in people’s opinions on climate change and how they are connected to other priorities and values. We recommend the value of qualitative research as a tool not only to better understand different environmental perspectives, but additionally to support two-way science communication among the broader public.

Journal

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences – Springer Journals

Published: Sep 1, 2023

Keywords: Climate change perceptions; Science communication; Environmental messaging; Qualitative research; Climate change communication

References

  • The circulation of climate change denial online: rhetorical and networking strategies on Facebook
    Bloomfield, EF; Tillery, D
  • Effects of partisan personalization in a news portal experiment
    Bryanov, K; Watson, BK; Pingree, RJ; Santia, M
  • Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?
    Cairney, P; Oliver, K
  • Reassessing emotion in climate change communication
    Chapman, DA; Lickel, B; Markowitz, EM
  • Transforming the stories we tell about climate change: from ‘issue’to ‘action’
    De Meyer, K; Coren, E; McCaffrey, M; Slean, C
  • Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics
    Drummond, C; Fischhoff, B
  • The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
    Kahan, DM; Peters, E; Wittlin, M; Slovic, P; Ouellette, LL; Braman, D; Mandel, G
  • Voter outreach campaigns can reduce affective polarization among implementing political activists: evidence from inside three campaigns
    Kalla, JL; Broockman, DE
  • Tackling Apathy and Denial
    Lertzman, R
  • Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community
    Lewandowsky, S; Oreskes, N; Risbey, J; Newelle, B; Smithson, M
  • Message framing and climate change communication: a meta-analytical review
    Li, N; Su, LY-F
  • Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
    McCright, AM; Dunlap, RE
  • Petro-masculinity and climate change denial among white, politically conservative American males
    Nelson, J
  • Theory and language of climate change communication
    Nerlich, B; Koteyko, N; Brown, B
  • Asking about climate change: Reflections on methodology in qualitative climate change research published in Global Environmental Change since 2000
    Nielsen, JO; D’haen, SAL
  • What causes people to change their opinion about climate change?
    Palm, R; Lewis, GB; Feng, B
  • Engaging diverse audiences with climate change: message strategies for global warming’s Six Americas
    Roser-Renouf, C; Stenhouse, N; Rolfe-Redding, J; Maibach, E; Leiserowitz, A
  • The paranoid style in American politics revisited: an ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking
    van der Linden, S; Panagopoulos, C; Azevedo, F; Jost, JT
  • Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in-depth studies across the world
    Wolf, J; Moser, SC
  • Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: how to improve communication across ideological divides?
    Zia, A; Todd, AM