Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal TheoryThe Architecture of Evidential Justification Between Atomism and Holism
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory: The Architecture of Evidential Justification...
Accatino, Daniela
2022-01-03 00:00:00
[This paper explores the debate between atomistic and holistic approaches to legal evidential reasoning, with two aims. The first is conceptual and analytical: it draws some distinctions to clarify in what senses a conception of legal evidential reasoning can be holistic or atomistic. The second purpose is normative: it defends a normative conception for justificatory reasoning about questions of fact in judicial fact finding that notwithstanding its predominantly atomistic character includes some holistic elements.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/theory-of-legal-evidence-evidence-in-legal-theory-the-architecture-of-V66sXCGDqF
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal TheoryThe Architecture of Evidential Justification Between Atomism and Holism
[This paper explores the debate between atomistic and holistic approaches to legal evidential reasoning, with two aims. The first is conceptual and analytical: it draws some distinctions to clarify in what senses a conception of legal evidential reasoning can be holistic or atomistic. The second purpose is normative: it defends a normative conception for justificatory reasoning about questions of fact in judicial fact finding that notwithstanding its predominantly atomistic character includes some holistic elements.]
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.