Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter concerns state neutrality: it discusses the requirement of Public Reason in the light of the historical debate on the abolition of slavery. Public Reason demands that state force be based upon reasons that are acceptable to all reasonable citizens; arguments derived from particular religious or metaphysical ‘comprehensive’ worldviews are excluded. Waldron rejects the constraints of Public Reason for being irrational: the Christian faith may be true. Moreover, its restraints are immoral: the abolition of slavery in the United States of America was expedited by Christian arguments; without such arguments slavery might have survived much longer. Instead, Waldron advocates ‘Comprehensive Reason’: all comprehensive views may be submitted; in case of disagreement, the democratic majority must decide.]
Published: Aug 28, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.