Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Despite several decades of effort, the field of psychology has largely failed to make any substantial gains in promoting widespread adoption of environmentally relevant behaviors (ERBs), regulations, or public policies. At the same time, huge impacts can be observed within other domains of science and engineering. The bulk of psychology’s contributions on the topic come from two major schools of thought, social/ environmental psychology and behavior analysis. This paper reviews these contributions in terms of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach both practically and conceptually. Understanding the role of verbal behavior in influencing environmentally significant action is suggested as a means of guiding research efforts toward the discovery of practical solutions. Contemporary behavioral analysis of language is cited as an example of behavior-change technology that suggests pragmatic solutions and promising avenues for future investigation.
Behavior and Social Issues – Springer Journals
Published: May 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.