Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B R Copeland (1994)
International Trade and the Environment: Policy Reform in a Polluted Small Open EconomyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26
M Kemp (1984)
A Note on the Theory of International TransferEconomics Letters, 14
L S Blume T Bergstrom (1986)
On the Private Provision of Public GoodsJournal of Public Economics, 29
P A Samuelson (1962)
The Gain from International Trade Once AgainEconomic Journal, 288
M S Taylor (1994)
North-South Trade and the EnvironmentQuarterly Journal of Economics, 109
V Norman (1980)
The Theory of International Trade: A Dual, General Equilibrium Approach
(1993)
?Debate: Does Free Trade Harm the Environment??
W Oates M I Cropper (1992)
Environmental Economics: A SurveyJournal of Economic Literature, 30
P Warr (1982)
Pareto Optimal Redistribution and Private CharityEconomics Letters, 19
G Hardin (1968)
The Tragedy of the CommonsScience, 162
(1994)
?Environmental Policy and International Trade - A Survey of Recent Economic Analysis,?
- and - (1995)
?Trade and Transboundary Pollution,? American Economic Review, Vol
H Wan (1972)
The Gain from Free TradeInternational Economic Review, 3
M Kemp (1962)
The Gain from International TradeEconomic Journal, 288
Abstract Consider trade liberalization between two countries, each of which produces two private goods and provides on a voluntary basis one public good (the common). In these circumstances, what are the consequences of trade liberalization on the production of the public good and on welfare in both countries? Using a Ricardian framework, we first show that the opening of trade increases the opportunity cost of producing the public good in both countries and will therefore reduce the aggregate supply of the public good. On the other hand, at the autarky equilibrium, only one country supplies the public good, the other “free rides”. The analysis of the welfare incidence of the opening of trade then reveals that the country which provides the public good under autarky always enjoys a welfare gain from trade while the free rider under autarky does not unless the terms of trade are sufficiently in its favour to compensate for the reduction in the supply of the common. Finally, if all countries involved in trade liberalization can without cost coordinate their supplies of the common, then the implementation of the first-best outcome is shown to be possible with a conditional Paretian transfer scheme.
The Japanese Economic Review – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 1997
Keywords: economics, general; microeconomics; macroeconomics/monetary economics//financial economics; econometrics; development economics; economic history
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.